Long -
Adam wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to test this effectively?
SInce this is very intermittant and to the point where you have to reboot my
first suggestion:
Run top and check for a memory leak from a process. I had this once where
apache would slowly use up the memory then all the swap s
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:48:26 +0300 (MSK)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does
> ifconfig xx down; ifconfig xx up
> helps?
Tried that many many times; no effect.
> Can be packet loss triggered by a lot of small
> packets on this interface?
Not that I've noticed. Any suggestions on how to test this
Richard Bejtlich wrote on January 09, 2004 11:17 AM
> I was wondering if anyone read the paper by Luca Deri
> (of Ntop fame) on "Improving Passive Packet Capture:
> Beyond Device Polling":
>
> http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf
>
> Luca makes some astounding claims regarding packet
> capture performa
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:02:23 +1000
> Q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The first thing you should try is setting the ethernet card to use
> > autosense. This enables the autosense pulse to be sent to the switch,
> > without this some passive/unmanaged switches can get very confused and
> > swit
Dear Friends,
How Can I make a wireless repeater BOX ?
I just want to extend my network range, So beside the
Antenna I think the Repeater is a good choice.
What is especiall in wireless repeater ?
Cheers,
AFShin
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signin
>Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:56:20 -0500 (EST)
>From: Anthony Volodkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Kenneth W Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: (revised) 4.0-stable & Linksys WRT54G won't talk w/each other
>
>Hey,
>
>Apparently the WRT54G is having some
Hey,
Apparently the WRT54G is having some arp issues. I'd check the following:
- install latest firmware
- install Ethereal on the windows machine and watch the traffic exchange
when you would ping/access the WRT54G. It is important that this is done
right after boot so that the Windows machin
Hi,
I am trying to setup an IPSEC transport between a Windows 2000 box
and a FreeBSD server for a customer... Both systems are on live
public IP's and packets are not filtered by any intermediate systems
or firewalls/routers in between.
I have the following setup:
Windows 2000 box: 1.1.1.2
F
oops, mistype, that should've been 4.9-stable instead of 4.0...
stupidfingers...
Hello:
I'm having problems getting a FreeBSD machine and a Linksys
WRT54G talking with each other.
Interfaces:
dc0 - "public" to outside Internet
dc1 - internal 192.168.0.1/24, connects to a hub
dc2 - internal 192.1
Hello:
I'm having problems getting a FreeBSD machine and a Linksys
WRT54G talking with each other.
Interfaces:
dc0 - "public" to outside Internet
dc1 - internal 192.168.0.1/24, connects to a hub
dc2 - internal 192.168.1.100/24, connects to a switched LAN port on the router
dc3 - currently unused
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone read the paper by Luca Deri
(of Ntop fame) on "Improving Passive Packet Capture:
Beyond Device Polling":
http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf
Luca makes some astounding claims regarding packet
capture performance, with FreeBSD performing very well
when device polling is
Just a quick follow up note on this ... this morning, we upgraded the
server in question to latest stable, and rebooted, to see if that would
clear up the problem ...
The problem persisted, but, based on comments about auto-negotiation made
in this thread, I figured I'd see if maybe 'forcing' to
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:47:59 -0500 (EST)
Mitch Collinsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you say "both ends" do you mean computer and network switch? Or
> do you mean computer A and computer B? Is the switch managed or
> unmanaged? You can't set full duplex on an unmanaged switch, it is
> a
13 matches
Mail list logo
