Re: VLAN MTU problem in 4.9 ?

2004-01-05 Thread .
> To answer your question; the Intel Etherexpress Pro/100 as it is > supported by the fxp driver accepts and sends the 4-byte VLAN enhanced > ethernet frames. Do you know does dc driver accepts and sends the 4-byte VLAN enhanced ethernet frames? I have not this ethernet now to test but can change

Re: wireless monitoring of APs???

2004-01-05 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote: > OK ok, if one could just see what other devices were out there it would be a > good start I suppose. I suggest you have a look at the WirelessLeiden and IEEE 802.11 MIBs. Some weeks ago I reviewed these for applicability to Fre

Re: 5.1r Bridge with one ip - no access from non-ip side

2004-01-05 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Try sysctl net.inet.ip.check_interface=0. -- Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: wireless monitoring of APs???

2004-01-05 Thread paul van den bergen
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:13 pm, you wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:16:47PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote: > > How about snmp information display programs for FreeBSD? > > I'm working on something like this. What exactly do you want to measure > or monitor? Ah! yes... see, now there is the rub

Re: wireless monitoring of APs???

2004-01-05 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:16:47PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote: > How about snmp information display programs for FreeBSD? I'm working on something like this. What exactly do you want to measure or monitor? BMS ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list ht

Re: Odd behaviour on em0 device in -stable ... I think ...

2004-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > It is the OS that generates a gratuitous ARP every time you assign an IP > address (or alias) to a card, though i am not sure if it sends one for > each address assigned to the card, or just one for the newly configured > address -- the latter would not sol

RE: Odd behaviour on em0 device in -stable ... I think ...

2004-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Sreekanth wrote: > The "Link is up" message can be explained by the fact the device is > reset everytime an alias is added or removed.Network hanging is > explained by the spanning tree protocol working(It prevents the port > from going into Forward state for around 20 seconds)

Re: wireless monitoring of APs???

2004-01-05 Thread paul van den bergen
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:03 pm, Randy Bush wrote: > most APs have snmp sorry for the delayed response, I've been away :-) as usual, answers raise more questions... and another hole in my knowledge snmp = simple network management protocol, I presume, and allows network state data to be transp

5.1r Bridge with one ip - no access from non-ip side

2004-01-05 Thread Bjorn Eikeland
Hi I've set up a bridge between the lan in my flat an my isp's adsl modem/nat router to shape traffic and also provide some services to both the lan and 'wan' side. current setup: router --- (xl0) bridge (fxp0) --- switch w/ clients 10.0.0.1no-ip dhcp dhcp (10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.20-1

Re: Polling CPU usage

2004-01-05 Thread Alexander Langer
Also sprach Markus Oestreicher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Is there a way to get the real processor usage including > the time spent on polling? What machine do you use? When bridging approx. 25 MB/s (so 200 MBit/s; 1 MB of traffic roughly estimates to 1500 packets here) on a Duron 700 with ~2800 ipfw

Re: Odd behaviour on em0 device in -stable ... I think ...

2004-01-05 Thread Barney Wolff
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:36:43PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > One of the odd things I'm finding with the em0 device, over the fxp0 > device on the other machines, is that if/when I do alias (or -alias), the > network hangs for a couple of seconds, and the following gets generated in > /var

Re: Odd behaviour on em0 device in -stable ... I think ...

2004-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > i am partly lost on the details of your specific question, but > the symptoms do seem to suggest a stale ARP entry, which must be > in the router (if the switch had a stale entry in its MAC forwarding > table, you would have problems even with local pings,

Current problem reports assigned to you

2004-01-05 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net NFS root configurations without dynamic

Re: VLAN MTU problem in 4.9 ?

2004-01-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Jeremie LE HEN wrote: > > > I know now, that xl interface can't pass 1504 frames > > and most 1G interfaces can > > don't know about another 100M interfaces > > Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 also supports it. I don't know if << Jumbo > Frames >> are supported under FreeBSD with this network adapte

Re: VLAN MTU problem in 4.9 ?

2004-01-05 Thread Jeremie LE HEN
> I know now, that xl interface can't pass 1504 frames > and most 1G interfaces can > don't know about another 100M interfaces Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 also supports it. I don't know if << Jumbo Frames >> are supported under FreeBSD with this network adapter, but it is under Linux with the dri

Re: Odd behaviour on em0 device in -stable ... I think ...

2004-01-05 Thread Luigi Rizzo
i am partly lost on the details of your specific question, but the symptoms do seem to suggest a stale ARP entry, which must be in the router (if the switch had a stale entry in its MAC forwarding table, you would have problems even with local pings, not only remote ones). It is the OS that genera