Re: Controlling ports used by natd

2003-12-22 Thread Brett Glass
At 10:12 PM 12/22/2003, Barney Wolff wrote: >It is odd that libalias picks a port number, and then, if the "use sockets" >option is set, tries to open a socket on that port. Perhaps if the above >option is set, it should bind port 0 and use the port the kernel assigns. > >If folks think that's a

Re: Controlling ports used by natd

2003-12-22 Thread Barney Wolff
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:33:31PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Brett Glass wrote: > > > It is also interesting that natd doesn't respect the > > "hifirst..hilast" settings here. Shouldn't it look at > > these variables and avoid assigning ports that the > > machine on w

Re: Controlling ports used by natd

2003-12-22 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Brett Glass wrote: > net.inet.ip.portrange.lowfirst: 1023 > net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast: 600 > net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 1024 > net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 5000 > net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152 > net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535 > > Why is "lowfirst" greater tha

Re: arla

2003-12-22 Thread Kirill Ponomarew
Hi, On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:12:16PM -0700, Mark Ogden wrote: > I have built 0.35.9 and 0.35.10 on 4.9 and 4.8. If you take a look at net/arla/Makefile, you can see why it's broken in ports. It requires kernel sources and kerberos. -Kirill pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: kern/37761: process exits but socket is still ESTABLISHED

2003-12-22 Thread Andre Oppermann
Synopsis: process exits but socket is still ESTABLISHED State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: andre State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 22 13:10:42 PST 2003 State-Changed-Why: Asking whether this is still a problem. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->andre Responsible-Changed-B

Re: arla

2003-12-22 Thread Mark Ogden
Mark Ogden on Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:06:14PM -0700 wrote: > Kirill Ponomarew on Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:02:04PM +0100 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 01:48:06PM -0700, Mark Ogden wrote: > > > Has anyone out there built arla on 5.1? > > > > If you meant net/arla, it's broken. > >

Re: arla

2003-12-22 Thread Kirill Ponomarew
Hi, On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 01:48:06PM -0700, Mark Ogden wrote: > Has anyone out there built arla on 5.1? If you meant net/arla, it's broken. -Kirill pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

arla

2003-12-22 Thread Mark Ogden
Has anyone out there built arla on 5.1? -- Mark L Ogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

crossover between gigE?

2003-12-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > As long as the chipsets are compliant, an 8 wire straight thru cable > works as both a straight and a crossover. The GigE standard requires > this behaviour. "Crossover" isn't meaningful in the case of GigE: both stations transmit and receive simultaneously on all four paris. -GAWollm

Current problem reports assigned to you

2003-12-22 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2002/03/09] conf/35726 net Won't let me use ifconfig on the interfac 1 problem total. Serious problems

Re: squid to ftp and https

2003-12-22 Thread Q
You can only transparently proxy unencrypted data streams. There is no point in proxying port 443 because the SSL protocol is designed to prevent exactly this from being possible. So port 443 is out.. but there are a few others that are still viable.. and it's not very hard to setup. Make sure yo

squid to ftp and https

2003-12-22 Thread Eicke
Hi folks, I am using a FreeBSD server as transparent proxy server. To make this I use ipfw to foward port 80 requests. I have a doubt, I like that 443, 8080, 8000, 8081 ports and FTP pass through proxy too. How can I make this? Thanks and regards. Eicke.