I have a bridge configured as follows:
Bge0- management interface, ip a.b.c.d
Bge1- down (not used)
Bge2- "inside" bridge leg, no ip, layer-2 only
Bge3- "outside" bridge leg, no ip, layer-2 only
Now, I am seeing some weird behavior. If I try to do any type of net access
over bge0
if you use ipfw then the 'fwd' command CAN be used to force this if you
set up the routes correctly.. you send the packets to addresses that can
only reached through the different interfaces according to the routes
that you have installed..
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Dear Hack
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>
> Dear Hackers,
>
> could we please commit the attached patch. it fixes the dummynet(4) panic
> when you do ipfw(8) flush with configured dummynet(4) rules.
Your patch looks good.
> p.s. if re@ will give a green ligth can someone please commit it?
> i will not be
Dear Hackers,
could we please commit the attached patch. it fixes the dummynet(4) panic
when you do ipfw(8) flush with configured dummynet(4) rules.
thanks,
max
p.s. if re@ will give a green ligth can someone please commit it?
i will not be able to do it until evening.
__
Dear Hackers,
is there a way to force packets to go out on a specific interface
based on a source IP address?
here is what we want: for testing purposes we have a FreeBSD box with
two 100Mbit NICs (em0 and em1). both NICs are on the the same subnet
172.1.1.x/23. both NICs are connected to the Se
