At 00:23 28/11/2003, you wrote:
> When killing :
> Nov 26 23:23:42 f1 freevrrpd[410]: restoring real MAC address:
> 00:B0:D0:E1:32:D8 for interface fxp1
fxp1? :)
Oups ... copied the wrong lines :))
Nov 26 21:24:37 f1 freevrrpd[2694]: launching daemon in background mode
Nov 26 21:24:37 f1 freevrrpd[
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:00:01AM +0100, Spyou wrote:
> mine stays unchanged before, during and after running freevrrpd (parent
> ether & vlan managed by freevrrpd) .. that's why i was thinking this is a
> problem with the FXP driver ...
> When killing :
> Nov 26 23:23:42 f1 freevrrpd[410]: re
At 23:54 27/11/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:38:40PM +0100, Spyou wrote:
> Damn ! The mac address of you vlan (and, i suppose, of you ether card) has
> changed ...
Ether card MAC and other vlans are unchanged. Thats what we are expecting. :)
According to your last mail,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:38:40PM +0100, Spyou wrote:
> Damn ! The mac address of you vlan (and, i suppose, of you ether card) has
> changed ...
Ether card MAC and other vlans are unchanged. Thats what we are expecting. :)
> Mine doesn't change at anytime (except if i fire freevrrpd up and cre
At 23:23 27/11/2003, you wrote:
vlan0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 10.255.255.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.255.255.255
inet6 fe80::250:fcff:fe5e:5b40%vlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
ether 00:00:e8:41:cd:10
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
status: acti
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:56:58PM +0100, Spyou wrote:
> This solution (w/o vlans) works .. the downtime is something like 3/4
> seconds .. wich is acceptable for my applications :)
>
> but i can't work w/o vlans :(
R1:
% ifconfig vlan0 create vlan 1 vlandev de0
% ifconfig vlan0 inet add 10.255
At 22:54 27/11/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
When moving IP address from R1 to R2, R2 is not able to bring this IP
up cause it already has route to that network in routing table. Is it
possible You have similar problem here?
I had this problem a few days ago ...
I've found a solution that is not
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:37:35PM +0100, Spyou wrote:
> Now, i need to isolate some servers into vlans. So i create vlans on the
> interface managed by VRRP, i told VRRP to use various vlans instead of the
> parent interface ... And ... here's the probleme ...
>
> as you might know, VRRP modif
Hi there,
I'm currently playing with a "quite" simple network infrastructure :
---
| INTERNET|
---
| |
|R1|---|R2|
| |
-----
| SWITCH ||servers & co|
-----
R1 & R2 are
Hi,
I asked a similar question to Archie Cobbs about a week ago
and the answer is : it is not possible unless someone develops
the missing part AFAIK.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:44:53 +0100
Anders Nordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to setup a l2tp server, but being new to the co
Hi,
I am trying to setup a l2tp server, but being new to the concept of
netgraph i can't understand how it is supposed to be done.
What I am trying to do is a VPN concentrator using l2tp and IPSec, I
have found some rather vague references that this should be possible (
but almost all seem to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
