Re: dummynet "OUCH! pipe should have been idle!"-message in 4.9-RC

2003-10-15 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:06:07 -0700 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got this on 4.8-STABLE from July 16 the other day while playing with > dummynet configuration. > > I also managed to put tun0 into an unusable state on my firewall > (running ppp(8) with netgraph pppoe on a dsl modem)

Re: ipfw2 on freebsd4.7-release

2003-10-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:20:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I want to use ipfw2 on freebsd4.7-release version. But when i compiled kernel, > libalias and ipfw with ipfw2 options, this is not work. When i try to add rule, > i accured an error message. Provide more details, like th

Re: dummynet "OUCH! pipe should have been idle!"-message in 4.9-RC

2003-10-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 07:10:54PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > [please CC me] > > > > I noticed this log message on a 4.9-RC (src from ~Oct 1): > > ---snip--- > > Oct 9 15:57:42 Andro-Beta /kernel: dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle! >

Re: routed(8) and static routes

2003-10-15 Thread Eugene Grosbein
At the other point, I cannot make routed(8) to announce default route without introducing total mess. I tried to set non-zero hopcount to the static default route or to run 'routed -s -g'. In both cases routed starts to announce default route and stops to keep (and announce) many of specific route