On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:45:57PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> How often is "so often"? The vendor branch is over a year old and the
> bug that seems to annoy
> most real users of bpf has been known for quite a while longer and took
> a while to get into
> the origin and now it only would nee
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
This is coming up more often. Perhaps we should consider net/libpcap-devel
and net/tcpdump-devel ports for people who wish to track CVS and/or
snapshots of these tools? This might relieve some of the pressure on Bill
to update the vendor branch so often.
How often is "so
Hi,
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:24:45 +0300
> Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>TCLASS is not supported in current FreeBSD. It will merged into
>FreeBSD during next KAME merge.
pete> Is this planned before or after 5.2?
I wish to merge in time for 5.2-RELEASE.
Sincerely,
--
Haji
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Are you talking about running the phone line directly to the fbsd box
> with no dsl modem?
Yes. Also, PPPoA in FreeBSD is currently only implemented if you use ngatm,
because of the signalling involved. RFC 1483 framing is a simple bo
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
TCLASS is not supported in current FreeBSD. It will merged into
FreeBSD during next KAME merge.
Is this planned before or after 5.2?
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:08:56PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:55:28AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> > 1) Any viable solution with FreeBSD for doing that kinds (PPPoA or RFC
> > 1483) of encapsulation.
>
> Using xDSL will be difficult. There is a driver I ha
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:43:44AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> >Shurely you mean tcpdump 3.7.2, which is already imported (by fenner, with
> >additional hacks)?
> I mean libpcap, which also tcpdump uses, if I´m not mistaken. Look in
> contrib/libpcap
This is coming up more often. Perhaps we sh
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:55:28AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> 1) Any viable solution with FreeBSD for doing that kinds (PPPoA or RFC
> 1483) of encapsulation.
Using xDSL will be difficult. There is a driver I have picked up for the
Lanai chip (Efficient Networks SpeedStream 30x0 series
Hi,
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 19:26:10 +0300
> Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pete> What is the right way to set the TRAFFIC CLASS field in
pete> ipv6 packets sent from an application? I´m looking for
pete> function similar to setsockopt IP_TOS with IPv4.
TCLASS is not supported in
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> BD>All are within other code. One example is in dev/mii/brgphy.c which a
> BD>phy feature is not enabled when it is attached to some MACs. A messier
> BD>example is in the new ATM code wh
What is the right way to set the TRAFFIC CLASS field in
ipv6 packets sent from an application? I´m looking for
function similar to setsockopt IP_TOS with IPv4.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
Hi,
It should be possible to set the link layer address of an interface whilst
also setting the IP address. Here's a revised patch for ifconfig(8) to
add this functionality (against HEAD) based on the one in the PR.
There is a problem in that applying this patch modifies syntax such that
statemen
12 matches
Mail list logo
