On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, The Jetman wrote:
> Mike: OKAY ! This is unknown territory for me, so I didn't know
> TCPDUMP could be a friend, but I gen'd a simple TCPDUMP session, monitoring
> a session via wi0 to my ISP's FTP server called (for the purps of this dump)
> foobar.com. The test targe
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Hi Marko,
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:05:15PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> > Network stack cloning patches allow for multiple fully independent network
> > stacks to simultaneously coexistst in a single FreeBSD kernel. Combined with
> [snip]
>
> Your work is most interesti
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 1024
This will kill your send performance. Try raising it to 32 or 64k.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I've got a question about dummynet pipes, basically I've installed two rules per user
to control their traffic flow:
add 150 pipe 15 ip from 78.77.76.21 to any out
pipe 15 config bw 512Kbit/s queue 10
add 160 pipe 16 ip from any to 78.77.76.21 in
pipe 16 config bw 512Kbit/s queue 10
However, th
Hi Marko,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:05:15PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> Network stack cloning patches allow for multiple fully independent network
> stacks to simultaneously coexistst in a single FreeBSD kernel. Combined with
[snip]
Your work is most interesting. I look forward to using it as a
Network stack cloning patches allow for multiple fully independent network
stacks to simultaneously coexistst in a single FreeBSD kernel. Combined with
jail-style separation between user processes and with proportional-share
extensions to the standard BSD CPU scheduler, the patched kernel can
e
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, The Jetman wrote:
> Folks: ...that is, on my system. This is driving me crazy. I
> built w/o much difficulty an NATing Internet gateway, using a fixed wireless
> connection. (The WiFi card is an Orinoco Silver PCMCIA NIC.) It's been
> working non-stop for over 18 mos
