On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:15:42PM -0400, Sheri Salami wrote:
> Hello:
>
> We are actively working on a project to implement SCTP (actually we want
> to implement the whole SIGTRAN stack ) on FreeBSD 5.1-current. Are
> there any others who have succesfully done this on 5.1? and are there
> any
Hello:
We are actively working on a project to implement SCTP (actually we want
to implement the whole SIGTRAN stack ) on FreeBSD 5.1-current. Are
there any others who have succesfully done this on 5.1? and are there
any suggestions or reference info on building and testing?. Or is better
to
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:53:56AM -0700, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > no, it is not possible to delete them -- you have no way to tell
> > which rule to delete when multiple rules share the same number.
>
> Are there any plans to make ipfw more flexi
Hi All,
There would be no theoretical problem with adding syntax to ipfw(8)
(and possibly to its kernel interface) to delete a particular rule
would there? eg ipfw delete 1234.5 to delete the fifth instance of
rule 1234? There is clearly a fixed order to the rules, since they
apply in order.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > no, it is not possible to delete them -- you have no way to tell
> > which rule to delete when multiple rules share the same number.
>
> Are there any plans to make ipfw more flexible by changing the
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dan Hardiker wrote:
>
> [MPD Log File]
> I havent yet worked out how to get mpd into its own log file - have to
> modify syslog.conf I believe. My current all.log file is very very big and
> has lots of mpd stuff in, but would consitute a 10mb file. Is there anything
> in pa
Tobias,
> > After a very long delay (sorry!) I'm pleased to announce that I'm still
> around
> > and new a snapshot can be downloaded from
>
> kickass! I will try it out later today
:)
> > Here is the list of things I'm planing to do next:
> >
> > o Prepare patches for FreeBSD source tree
> >
Thus spake Michael Bretterklieber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09/09/03 03:28]:
> > Ideally, I'd like to get MPD authenticating via PAM, and then I can use
> > pam_winbind to authenticate against a domain. Any pointers or suggestions
> > (this looks like it will take a patch or some coding) would be great
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> no, it is not possible to delete them -- you have no way to tell
> which rule to delete when multiple rules share the same number.
Are there any plans to make ipfw more flexible by changing the 65535 to
the next power of two ? So there are a lot more r
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:25:50AM +0200, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
> > Something like Squid does using Samba's winbindd & co.
> You can use RADIUS for authenticating against your windows boxes. I guess
> you have a Win2K Server somewhere, if yes, then it's easy enableing (IAS
> == Internet Au
Probably best you ignore the past post while I go sleep ... should have been
aimed at freebsd-net@ ... sorry
Here you go freebsd-net guys. Sorry for the mess up.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Hardiker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Bretterklieber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PRO
Just a bit more information which might help clear things up:
If I ping from 192.168.1.3 to 192.168.1.101 and leave it going - ALL my
traffic from the XP box to the LAN works fine (in moderation). For example -
as long as the server is pinging me (just a standard "ping -t
192.168.1.101") I can pin
> [Dan Hardiker]
> I have since managed to find (on the source forge mpd mailing list not
> mentioned on the mpd homepages) someone else with an identical problem
(who
> was advised to install a TCP-MSS patch). It appears that the problem lies
> with XP connected to MPD using a VPN. Actually on ref
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dan Hardiker wrote:
> I have since managed to find (on the source forge mpd mailing list not
> mentioned on the mpd homepages) someone else with an identical problem (who
> was advised to install a TCP-MSS patch). It appears that the problem lies
> with XP connected to MPD
> > [Dan Hardiker]
> > When I connect to the VPN I get a connection status box in my XP sys
tray.
> > If I open that up I get a list of bytes sent and received, as well as
the
> > compression % and number of errors. Compression is always 0% even
through I
> > tell mpd to use compression and have ch
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Dan Hardiker wrote:
> Ive now hit a barrier I just cant cross without help. Theres nothing out on
> the net and every where I go they point to this newsgroup / mailing list.
> Here it goes...
>
> I have setup MPD to be best of my ability and am getting intermitant packet
>
Hi Alessandro,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently and successfully using MPD 3.13 on a 4.7p9 box as PPTP
> RAS for a bunch of Win2K/XP clients.
>
> I'ld know if it is possible to authenticate such users against a Win2K
> mixed mode domain (NTLM and/or LDAP)
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Ideally, I'd like to get MPD authenticating via PAM, and then I can use
> pam_winbind to authenticate against a domain. Any pointers or suggestions
> (this looks like it will take a patch or some coding) would be greatly
> appreciated.
You can use Fre
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:45:03PM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> After a very long delay (sorry!) I'm pleased to announce that I'm still around
> and new a snapshot can be downloaded from
kickass! I will try it out later today
[snip of long interesting list of enhancments]
> Here is the list
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:53PM -0700, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I create two ipfw rules with the same ID:
>
> ipfw add 00022 deny ip from x to y
> ipfw add 00022 allow ip from z to b
>
> they will both be there, and both work ... but is it possible to remove
> just one of them wihou
20 matches
Mail list logo
