You may want or you may not want the UDP checksum,
depending on what sort of error checking exists in the
overlying protocol. This needs to be determined on a
protocol by protocol, per socket, since some protocols
might want it and others might not. It must be the
application programmers choice and
[Redirected to -net as more appropriate]
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:06:16PM -0700, Jerry Toung wrote:
> BMS,
> please be patient. I guess I am still a little bit confuse as to how a
> packet goes from a real NIC (i.e xl0) to the gre pseudo-device.
No problem. :-)
> in if_gre.c, you define a new
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:43:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FreeBSD ought to add per-socket socket options to
> allow a programmer to turn on and off the don't
> fragment bit for UDP and the UDP checksum, on a per
> socket basis.
Why? Sure, it would be easy enough to do, but why exactly
FreeBSD ought to add per-socket socket options to
allow a programmer to turn on and off the don't
fragment bit for UDP and the UDP checksum, on a per
socket basis.
This, at least I would think, would be very easy for
someone knowledgable in the networking implementation
to implement.
Thank you
Further searching turned up a post on the Quagga-users list which suggested
TTL might be the culprit.
I bounce the interface using ifconfig to recreate the interface route
in the routing table, then throw tcpdump extra options to monitor MTU,
as well as running route -nv monitor in the background:
Hi all,
First of all apologies for the length of this mail - it is quite voluminous
as I'm trying to pack in all required information.
I don't seem to be able to achieve an end-to-end path between my Cisco
2520 and my laptop running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE using the GRE tunneling
protocol. Before I d
Donald Burr of Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Description of:]
>Our gateway machine and server gets its own IP, IP A.
>My desktop machine is hooked up via ethernet. It should get IP B.
>Same thing as above for my roomie's desktop, except it gets IP C.
>[all else] Ideally I'd like t
try:
route add -inet6 default YOUR_TUNNEL_BROKER_ENDPOINT_IPv6
Danny Horne wrote:
Hi all,
Hope someone can clear this up for me.
I'm trying to get up to speed on IPv6 & have tried two different tunnel brokers
(Freenet6 & BTExact). Both of these suppliers supply scripts to set things up.
I recently switched to a new DSL provider (DSLExtreme), and in doing so,
decided to opt to buy multiple static IP's. The idea is that I would like
one static IP for the server, and separate static IP's for our desktop
machines, so that things such as IRC DCC, streaming media, etc. will "just
work"
On 8/29/03 12:18 PM, "Danny Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivo Vachkov was once thought to have said:
>
>> try:
>> route add -inet6 default YOUR_TUNNEL_BROKER_ENDPOINT_IPv6
>>
> This is the script I was sent to set things up -
> #!/bin/sh
> ifconfig gif create
> gifconfig gif0 inet 217.204.
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nathan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I have an IBM Thinkpad 600X which dual boots 5.1-Current and XP-Pro. I
: purchased a Netgear MA401 wireless 802.11b card which worked fine under
: both OS's for about a week. This past Saturday, however, I was
I have an IBM Thinkpad 600X which dual boots 5.1-Current and XP-Pro. I
purchased a Netgear MA401 wireless 802.11b card which worked fine under
both OS's for about a week. This past Saturday, however, I was unable
to connect to websites, my mail server etc. The symptoms are the same
under both OS
12 matches
Mail list logo
