On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 03:39:24AM BST, Mike Wade wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Andy Gilligan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 01:31:23AM BST, Mike Wade wrote:
> > > I'm running FreeBSD 4.8 RELEASE w/ IPFW2 support enabled. I'm running
> > > into some weirdness with the mac address matching fe
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Andy Gilligan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 01:31:23AM BST, Mike Wade wrote:
> > I'm running FreeBSD 4.8 RELEASE w/ IPFW2 support enabled. I'm running
> > into some weirdness with the mac address matching feature or perhaps it's
> > my lack of understanding how it interacts
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 01:31:23AM BST, Mike Wade wrote:
> I'm running FreeBSD 4.8 RELEASE w/ IPFW2 support enabled. I'm running
> into some weirdness with the mac address matching feature or perhaps it's
> my lack of understanding how it interacts with other rules. :)
>
> My goal is to transpare
I'm running FreeBSD 4.8 RELEASE w/ IPFW2 support enabled. I'm running
into some weirdness with the mac address matching feature or perhaps it's
my lack of understanding how it interacts with other rules. :)
My goal is to transparently redirect everything except a few select MAC
addresses but it d
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:28:35PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Steve Francis wrote:
>
> > I have a FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #5 system that reported:
> > Aug 1 11:50:39 rack2-101 /kernel: All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see
> > tuning(7).
> > Aug 1 11:50:39 rack2-101 /
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Peter C. Lai wrote:
> Patch seems to be working fine. I also seem to be getting better linkage and
> transfer speeds too but that could just be my imagination *shrug*. Thanks.
It's possible that performance would be better under certain situations,
but it would take a lot of
Patch seems to be working fine. I also seem to be getting better linkage and
transfer speeds too but that could just be my imagination *shrug*. Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:05:49PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Peter C. Lai wrote:
>
> > I'm noticing on a moderately
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Scot Loach wrote:
> I don't think that's the problem, although it does seem suspicious.
>
> Here's the struct ucred pointed to by the socket:
>
> (kgdb) p *so.so_cred
> $2 = {cr_ref = 3279453304, cr_uid = 3486088556, cr_ngroups = 1, cr_groups =
> {
> 0, 3276863080, 3277717
I don't think that's the problem, although it does seem suspicious.
Here's the struct ucred pointed to by the socket:
(kgdb) p *so.so_cred
$2 = {cr_ref = 3279453304, cr_uid = 3486088556, cr_ngroups = 1, cr_groups =
{
0, 3276863080, 3277717504, 21162, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4294967295, 4294967295,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:00:09PM +0200, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> > From: Bryce Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 18:59
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: freevrrp
> >
> > I'm trying to run freevrrpd on a server with two interfaces
> > for redundancy.
>
> I
10 matches
Mail list logo
