That brings an interesting topic.If the Interface has not been assigned
an IP address.The Interface is NOT initialized.So you cannot really use
the interface.Ofcourse you can bypass this by hacking into driver.But do
you want to do that is another questions.
Just my 2 cents
Sreekanth
> -Ori
On Friday 11 July 2003 14:21, Sreekanth wrote:
> Couldn't it be done just by executing the following command ?
> #route add 255.255.255.255 -net 255.255.255.255 -ifp [primary
> interface]
>
> I know it is kind of crude but it works in my case :-)
In our case, it's being run before *any* interface
On Friday 11 July 2003 14:09, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 11 Jul, Wes Peters wrote:
> > What we observed on our embedded system is the packet gets sent on
> > all attached interfaces, with dest IP 255.255.255.255, and a src IP
> > of the local address that has the default route. If there isn't a
> > def
Wes Peters wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 12:01, Chuck Swiger wrote:
If you have multiple interfaces, a broadcast to 255.255.255.255
should go out on all of them. That being said, the all-ones
broadcast address means "all local networks", and most routers will
block such traffic from passing on in
Couldn't it be done just by executing the following command ?
#route add 255.255.255.255 -net 255.255.255.255 -ifp [primary interface]
I know it is kind of crude but it works in my case :-)
Sreekanth
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O
On 11 Jul, Wes Peters wrote:
> What we observed on our embedded system is the packet gets sent on all
> attached interfaces, with dest IP 255.255.255.255, and a src IP of the
> local address that has the default route. If there isn't a default
> route, sending to 255.255.255.255 fails with "n
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 12:01, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Matthew Grooms wrote:
> > Is there any way to generate a udp broadcast ( all routes
> > 255.255.255.255 ) packet using a standard sendto() without it being
> > translated into a local network broadcast? Is this just not
> > "allowed"?
>
> Ar
Hi all,
i am working the research in University
it has been said that freeBSD is more stable et faster
than linux !
what element do you base on for expalain this result ?
i am looking forward to reply
thanks,
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.
answered in private email
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> i get the following error when trying to start pppoed
> I am running 4.8-STABLE
>
> /usr/libexec/pppoed -Fd -P /var/run/pppoed.pid -n 5 -p "*" rl1
>
>
> Sending PPPOE_LISTEN to .:pppoe-1581, provi
Hello,
i get the following error when trying to start pppoed
I am running 4.8-STABLE
/usr/libexec/pppoed -Fd -P /var/run/pppoed.pid -n 5 -p "*" rl1
Sending PPPOE_LISTEN to .:pppoe-1581, provider *
pppoed: SENDING MESSAGE:
pppoed: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=15 addr=".:pppoe-1581" }
pppoed: NG_MESG
On 10/07/2003 21:45, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please see http://speedtouch.sourceforge.net/index.php?/news.en.html
>
> "Real" PPPoE with a ethernet card connected with a ADSL Modem works.
>
> This problem is related with ISPs that supports *only* PPPoE protocol
> with USB Modems (this c
11 matches
Mail list logo
