Dear sirs,
could you take a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/47920
This problem is really annoying: large PPPoE network
can be DoSed with one non-standard packet. Moreover,
if there is >1 FreeBSD machine in network, it is really
difficult to return network to normal beh
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 08:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:18:06PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> E> Does FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE keep per-interface summary for received
> E> unicast octets? More precisely, I need to know number of unicast
> E> octets received by my router via e
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:18:06PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
E> Does FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE keep per-interface summary for received
E> unicast octets? More precisely, I need to know number of unicast
E> octets received by my router via ep0 from uplink. Its ethernet interface
E> carries lots of broa
Hi!
Does FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE keep per-interface summary for received
unicast octets? More precisely, I need to know number of unicast
octets received by my router via ep0 from uplink. Its ethernet interface
carries lots of broadcast (NETBIOS) traffic I need not care of.
Eugene Grosbein
P.S. I've
Hi,
Could any one give an example of writing applications for testing the Network Drivers
in FreeBSD.
Thanks
Swami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: freebsd-net Digest, Vol 16, Issue
> Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> > Make sure that you are diverting the traffic from LAN to
> DMZ via NATD.
>
> I didn'tunderstand very well:
> ipfw is not doing this thrue the "OPEN" configuration by default ?
>
No.
in rc.firewall (line 124):
${fwcmd} add 50 divert natd all from any to any via
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
Make sure that you are diverting the traffic from LAN to DMZ via NATD.
I didn'tunderstand very well:
ipfw is not doing this thrue the "OPEN" configuration by default ?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
>
> I've done that but it's not working.
>
> It's strange because if I ping www.site-example.com it goes
> to the right
> static ip.
> So it's pinging the right server.
>
> It could be apache configs but it happens also in qmail, ...
>
> I think it's natd but don't know how ...
>
Make sure
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:13:03AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Cool! Hopefully this work will include fixing lucent cards too :-)
Hail Eris. All hail Discordia.
By the way, have you seen RFC 3561? It's just out.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3561.html
Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Ro
I've done that but it's not working.
It's strange because if I ping www.site-example.com it goes to the right
static ip.
So it's pinging the right server.
It could be apache configs but it happens also in qmail, ...
I think it's natd but don't know how ...
_
Dear all,
There is a way to install a 2 network device with fault
tolerance(active-standby) or with load-balancing( virtual ip address)?
thanks in advance
yqyq22
_
MSN Extra Storage: piena libertà di esprimersi e comunicare
http://
Hi !
I've configured a dmz and our workstations (192.168.0) acess to external
sites very well.
But sites that are hosted in 192.168.1 that are port_redirected by natd
with static ip are blocked only if acessed by our workstations with
192.168.0
From internet is fine.
It blocks www.site-exampl
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:12:47PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
...
> With the increased interest in VoIP and similar these days, perhaps hardware
> DS/QoS support of this nature is something the project should explore?
the usual problem here is that if you want your mechanisms to be
useful, you
13 matches
Mail list logo
