Hi Doug,
Your analysis is correct (kern/46961), I am slowly working on the
fix but no ETA. It seems NetBSD recently has fixed a similar issue,
haven't checked this fact yet, just saw a promising commit log in
if_ethersubr.c.
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Julian Elischer writes:
| how does netgraph bridging do?
I'm actually using netgraph bridging sort-of, kind-of. Since I don't
care about loops and I'm only connecting to interfaces together
I just doing
ngctl connect vlan0: rl0: lower lower
with the setpromisc, setautosrc etc. Luigi's br
I'm trying to bridge VLAN traffic to network that doesn't have that VLAN,
something like:
(vlan network) -> fxp0 -> vlan0 <- FreeBSD bridge -> rl0 (no tag)
Both of the networks are the same except one side is tagged the other
has no tag.
It works fine in the "no tag" -> "tag" direction.
IT WORKS ! :)
Adding an explicit "set ifaddr" statement as suggested by Mr. Speyerer
was the key of this issue !
Now PPP(8) correctly negotiate with the peer and all works !
Im currently using the GPRS connection to writing this mail ;)
I would thank everbody answered me, many many thanks to yo
Thanks for the input. I still have the same problem but ...
I've now found that I can divert the traffic to any ip nr on my LAN but the
web servers ip nr. I've tampered around with the fw rules and it's still the
same thing. I've looked for that ip nr in all the files and found nothing.
I have re
Patrick Verkaik wrote [2003-07-02]:
>
> Does FreeBSD support multiple routing tables? If not, is any work being
> done in this area? From what I can find, it seems that Linux has this.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that I'd like to simulate a number of BGP routers
> on one box.
At the 2nd Europe
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:48:27PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >>"Since NAT actually adds no security,
> >You're of the school that sez "what I tell you three times is true?"
> It worked for Dorothy, right? :-)
Well... If you only want to convince hillbillies it might be enough.
Actually NAT ma
