Hi,
I have developed two enhancements for racoon.
First one is simple support for 'keepalive' statement
in racoon configuration file, which causes racoon
to keep link up with remote end even when there is
no traffic. It also does this when racoon is started,
which is very nice since it also cause
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to write a small program to send out gratituous arps
> (because the em driver does not work) for a redundancy (via IP address
> take over) scheme.
Hmm. If you're having if_em bugs and haven't already submitted a PR,
please do so. Ou
Thanks Garrett.
I am trying to write a small program to send out gratituous arps (because
the em driver does not work) for a redundancy (via IP address take over)
scheme.
I do NOT want to use libpcap or libnet as these will not be available on
prodution servers. I could probably statically link
Tom,
>Currently, we use a PPP tunnel to put the PBX and Phone on subnets that
>can talk to each other. The two FBSD boxen run as the endpoints of the
>tunnel. We need to be able to seamlessly forward multicast traffic between
>the remote network and the office network.
>
>Any ideas?
mrouted shou
< said:
> What is the BSD equivalent of this Linux call:
> sock=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_PACKET,htons(ETH_P_RARP));
man libpcap
-GAWollman
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any ma
Hi all,
What is the BSD equivalent of this Linux call:
sock=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_PACKET,htons(ETH_P_RARP));
Thanks,
-ansh
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
___
It seems that the most of the commercial deployment of IPv6 has been mostly
done in Asia. NTT/Verio has a Tier1 backbone in production.
Nanog has a FAQ entry about the subject:
http://www.nanog.org/listfaq.html
Maybe in the list of sites by contry you'll find something useful:
http://www.cs-ipv6.l
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:42:56PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> This isn't the answer you're looking for, but... I was very interested to
> see a CNET article that DoD has announced a concrete interest in deploying
> IPv6 over the next five years. If that is indeed the case, you're going
> to
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, agent dero wrote:
> I am starting a hosting company in southern texas using a couple of dual
> Pentium servers I got from a friend, and I using FreeBSD to run the
> whole sha- bang. I am also planning on using IPv6, mainly because of
> it's advantages, and I think the interne
Robert,
I think our situation is a bit more complicated, however, I'll draw it out
to hopefully add some direction.
##
### Office VOIP PBX### Routable IP Address Office Net
##
I am starting a hosting company in southern texas using a couple of dual
Pentium servers I got from a friend, and I using FreeBSD to run the whole sha-
bang. I am also planning on using IPv6, mainly because of it's advantages,
and I think the internet should start moving over to IPv6.
The big qu
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Tom Daly wrote:
> Could you clarify a bit? Are you able to move the multicast traffic
> between each side of the IP-IP tunnel?
Yes. We use mrouted to configure multicast tunnels in pretty much the
following way (IP addresses tweaked to protect the guilty):
% more mrouted.
Robert,
Could you clarify a bit? Are you able to move the multicast traffic
between each side of the IP-IP tunnel?
Tom
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Tom Daly wrote:
>
> > Has anyone been able to create a unified multicast broadcast domain
> > using FreeBSD ro
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Tom Daly wrote:
> Has anyone been able to create a unified multicast broadcast domain
> using FreeBSD routers and tunnels? Our internal telephone system VOIP
> system that uses multicast to handle things like conference calling and
> paging. Many of our employess are off sit
14 matches
Mail list logo
