On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> All,
>
> foo_intr()
> {
> ...
> disable_intr;
> ...
> process data;
> ...
> enable_intr;
> }
>
> Most of the network drivers currently do something like this in the ISR.
> Is this really necessary as by the time ISR is called interrupts have already be
On Friday 04 April 2003 13:06, Stef Telford wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> First of all, apologies if this is the wrong mailing
> list (did think that maybe mobile or perhaps hardware was the
> 'right' one). If this is horribly out of the mailing list topic
> let me know.
It's off-topic for this
All,
foo_intr()
{
...
disable_intr;
...
process data;
...
enable_intr;
}
Most of the network drivers currently do something like this in the ISR.
Is this really necessary as by the time ISR is called interrupts have already been
disabled on APIC and disabling interrupts on network card has no eff
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:22:04AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> Yes, this is a bug of the IPv6 code, and has been fixed in KAME
> snapshots. The fix should eventually be merged to the freebsd
> repository, but I'm not a committer and thus cannot tell when.
Ah, I saw you'
