Re: options FAST_IPSEC & tunnels

2003-04-01 Thread Sam Leffler
> On 4/1/2003 11:03 AM, Sam Leffler wrote: > > > > Long term, I intend is to associate packets with an enc device so > > there's a way to identify these packets when writing firewall rules. > > Alternatively (and already working), you can replace IPsec tunnel mode > with IPIP (gif) tunnels and tran

Re: options FAST_IPSEC & tunnels

2003-04-01 Thread Lars Eggert
On 4/1/2003 11:03 AM, Sam Leffler wrote: Long term, I intend is to associate packets with an enc device so there's a way to identify these packets when writing firewall rules. Alternatively (and already working), you can replace IPsec tunnel mode with IPIP (gif) tunnels and transport mode, and the

Re: options FAST_IPSEC & tunnels

2003-04-01 Thread Michael Sierchio
Sam Leffler wrote: Wow, someone besides me actually using fast ipsec! :) At least two of us, besides you... Packets are tagged once they've been processed on input. I think you can do a similar check with something like: if (m_tag_find(PACKET_TAG_IPSEC_IN_DONE) != NULL) goto pass; Long term,

Re: options FAST_IPSEC & tunnels

2003-04-01 Thread Sam Leffler
> I'm using IPSEC tunnels to join different gateways over the Internet. > > I've made some trials with FAST_IPSEC today (I've received a Soekris > VPN1201) and i'm facing a problem with incoming packets. > > The following code snippet from /sys/netinet/ip_input.c permits > detunneled packets to flo

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 dual-stack server

2003-04-01 Thread Jeff W. Boote
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > boote> This seems to contradict the recommendation in RFC 3493 (which I realize > boote> is only informational)... I've been doing a web search to try and find > boote> some kind of record for the rational used for making this default to > boote> v6only. I haven't found anyt

options FAST_IPSEC & tunnels

2003-04-01 Thread Eric Masson
Hello I'm using IPSEC tunnels to join different gateways over the Internet. I've made some trials with FAST_IPSEC today (I've received a Soekris VPN1201) and i'm facing a problem with incoming packets. The following code snippet from /sys/netinet/ip_input.c permits detunneled packets to flow wit

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 dual-stack server

2003-04-01 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:11:24 -0700 > "Jeff W. Boote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: boote> Hmm. So the trade-off is calling select or using IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED? Yes. boote> (My applications need to understand the addresses at a pretty detailed boote> level anyway - I'll probably stick