On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 10:42:39PM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote:
>
> You already mentioned that adding the -iface route to 10.* in combination
> with a default route to your gateway worked for everything except 207.172.3.*.
Actually, I don't think that's what he wrote. Rather, that net is an
exa
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 04:17:39PM -0500, J. W. Ballantine wrote:
>
> Of the 3 different possibilities mentioned:
>
> I did try route add -net without -iface, and the result was
> no route to host.
>
> I didn't try to arp to 207.172.3.* hosts because that sounded like
> a fix for only one small
