hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:12:05PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > As I stated originally, it's impossible to use 'maxsockbuf' value.
>
> That does not change the fact that an unprivileged user can use up to
> `maxsockbuf' bytes of wired kernel memory per socket. That's why the
> limit ex
< said:
> Wrong.
BZZZT!
> As I stated originally, it's impossible to use 'maxsockbuf' value.
That does not change the fact that an unprivileged user can use up to
`maxsockbuf' bytes of wired kernel memory per socket. That's why the
limit exists. The amount of memory allocated to socket buffer
hi,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:15:37PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Seriously, you didn't give any alternative. How does one
> > knows the maximum allowed limit? By just blindly trying?
>
> Ask for however much you think you actually need, and bleat to the
> administrator (or
Hello,
I am successfully running ipfw2 in FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE. Everything seems
fine, but it seems like the stats on each of the rules are just _way way_
low. On all rules I notice this.
for instance:
65123 556880155 55168583654 allow ip from any to any
This shows 55 gigabytes of total trans
You're not running out of mbufs or clusters, you're out of RAM.
Don't bump up nmbclusters anymore because you don't need to; instead,
add more RAM.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:05:51PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a good resource for kernel tuning on very high
> bandwidt
< said:
> Anyone knows how inetd [internal] services will behave under stress
> situation ?
Very poorly, since they were never intended to be used in that
manner. A purpose-built server will almost invariably handle loads
much better.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Anyone knows how inetd services will behave under
stress situation ?
I have a socket program that sends large amount of
data over n number of connections to inetd echo
servire using UDP, (echo_dg) and trying to compare
data on receive, I notice that when n increases (> 8),
program does not b
Hi,
Vincent Jardin wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2003 09:46, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
Hi,
Vincent Jardin schrieb:
1/ When Radius is used with mpd and the answer delay of the Radius server
is high, how can some PAP or CHAP timeout be avoided ?
you mean, that the client times out during authenti
On Monday 03 March 2003 09:46, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vincent Jardin schrieb:
> > 1/ When Radius is used with mpd and the answer delay of the Radius server
> > is high, how can some PAP or CHAP timeout be avoided ?
>
> you mean, that the client times out during authentication sayin
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Lu Guohan wrote:
> hello,
> I am new to hear, and I am not sure if anyone post this problem
> before. And I am figuring out the way to post this problem by PR
> since the web interface is not avaiable right now.
>
> RFC2581. Below is the trace, both the sender
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lu Guohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When TCP sender receives window update ack during loss
> recovery, the inflated tp->snd_cwnd doesn't get retracted
> after TCP recovered from multiple losses.
There were some serious bugs in the TCP implementation
hello,
I am new to hear, and I am not sure if anyone post this problem before. And I am
figuring out the way to post this problem by PR since the web interface is not
avaiable right now.
Description:
When TCP sender receives window update ack during loss recovery, the inflated
tp->snd_c
Hi
While I cant really comment on your code as such, another place this kind of
action would be useful would be for IPSEC processing. More often than not,
the IPSEC headder bumps the packet size over the limit and so fragmentation
occurs, particularly where the IPSEC is being handled by a gatewwa
Respected Sir
I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by
the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap.
I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code and
netinet6/in6_pcb.h and netinet/in_pcb.h so that length of the MIP6
extensi
Respected Sir
I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by
the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap.
I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code and
netinet6/in6_pcb.h and netinet/in_pcb.h so that length of the MIP6
extensi
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:47:10PM +0100, Vincent Jardin wrote:
V> 2/ mpd provides a command to create a bundle (new [-i ngX] ...), however there
V> is no command in order to remove the bundles. Have you ever tried to add this
V> feature ?
This feature is really needed. My current mpd configur
I find the function rad_send_request() in /usr/src/lib/libradius/libradius.c
will break the stack so that mpd gets segfault in FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p3,
but I can't figure out where it does.
If somebody want the core file, I can mail him.
I copied rad_send_request() into mpd's radius.c last week, a
Hi,
Vincent Jardin schrieb:
1/ When Radius is used with mpd and the answer delay of the Radius server is
high, how can some PAP or CHAP timeout be avoided ?
you mean, that the client times out during authentication saying that
the server didn't responded?
A known issue is that mpd is blocked d
18 matches
Mail list logo
