Does ipsec + dummynet combination work under 4.7-release / stable ? Any
tricks ?
Namely, I want to pass esp packets to a pipe in ipfw rules.
Thank you in advance.
--
Andriy Gapon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:13:42 -0800 (PST), in sentex.lists.freebsd.current
> you wrote:
> >be reliable, nevermind pleasant to look at. I only have access to
> >an 82550 card, so I don't know if this is fixed in the 82551 or not.
>
> Hi,
> Can you tell reliably from the dmesg which type one has ?
Yes, it's me. I'm still alive. And thanks to Wind River, I now know more
about the Intel 8255x ethernet chipset than I ever really wanted to.
Recently, I even learned how to enable checksum offload support for
the 82550 and 82551 chips, and I decided it would be a good idea to
add support for this
> > rl0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> > inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xafc broadcast 255.255.255.3
> This netmask looks very odd...
Did you set the netmask to 0xafc? This netmask will not work
period. (supprised FreeBSD lets you set it this way)
Can you set the netmask to 255.255.255.0 (0xff0
On 2003.02.24 10:39:08 -0400, Abel Alejandro wrote:
> If I shutdown rl0 then I can access fxp0 from the outside, but if I ifconfig
> rl0 up then
> I am just allowed to access fxp0 within machines in the 196.12.X.0 network.
>
> rl0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xafc bro
Hello, I have two interfaces. The rl0 is for monitoring purposes and fxp0 is
for normal internet access.
rl0 is attached to a catalyst port using SPAN, meaning all the traffic going
to the internet gets mirrored to
this port. fxp0 is on the same catalyst.
If I shutdown rl0 then I can access fxp0 f
Hi All
I hope somebody out there can help me with a problem I'm having.
I wan't to make a filtering bridge. I've got the bridge working (using
netgraph), but I can't seem to implement filtering using a bpf node.
My current configuration of the bridge is as follows:
+---
