Thomas Gielfeldt wrote:
> Would it be possible to implement a feature in MPD which allows you to
> create a node of type ng_ether instead of ng_iface to allow bridging the
> client onto the network instead of routing it?
You would have to implement bridging via PPP, which is different from
what PP
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 February 2003 06:44 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
> = On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 08:42, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> = > Using two cards, were one works fine is against aesthetics :-)
> = > That's my primary reason, although there are only two slots left in
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 06:44 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
= On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 08:42, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= > On Monday 03 February 2003 08:19 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
= > = On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 05:27, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= > = > Hi!
= > = >
= > = > This question bothered me for a while -- mo
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 08:42, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Monday 03 February 2003 08:19 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
> = On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 05:27, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> = > Hi!
> = >
> = > This question bothered me for a while -- most of the traffic on my
> = > LAN is just that -- local. Yet my gw/f
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:42:28AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> Finally, since the LAN consists of the private network addresses, which
> are not allowed through ISPs routers from the outside, the only danger
> is another subscriber on the same segment of the ISPs network or a
> wireless LAN
On Monday 03 February 2003 08:19 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
= On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 05:27, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= > Hi!
= >
= > This question bothered me for a while -- most of the traffic on my
= > LAN is just that -- local. Yet my gw/firewall machine only has one
= > interface -- with two IP addres
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Does natd(8) really need to see _all_ packets?
Not at all, as you've guessed. Subtleties abound with stateful
rules, and side effects of using the divert mechanism, such as:
after returning from natd packets don't know which interface they
came in on. Matching rules the
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:00:46AM +0200, Emilian Ursu wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> > > your best solution is to add a skipto before the divert rule.
> >
> > Thank you, Barry, but is not that what I'm doing in the sample?
> >
> > > You can therefore skip any traffi
Hi,
It works here like a charm, but with ipfw(8), not ipfilter(8), so that
it might be where the problem is. The setup is as follows:
/etc/rc.firewall:
[...]
${fwcmd} add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from A.B.C.0/28 to any 80
via gre0 in
${fwcmd} add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 05:27, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This question bothered me for a while -- most of the traffic on my LAN
> is just that -- local. Yet my gw/firewall machine only has one interface
> -- with two IP addresses -- private and public on it.
>
> The DSL modem is plugged into
10 matches
Mail list logo