> I over-simplified the problem - I'm not talking about 4 hosts on pure
> Ethernet here, I'm really talking about hundreds to thousands with
> some portions running over radio. The rules change dynamically and
> pretty frequently (like potentially on the order of seconds) - I have
> a routing daem
Hi,
I've been toying with my test FreeBSD server
(4.7-RELEASE-p3) to try to set up a plain old PPP
server. I'm at a point where the modem answers, the
connection goes up (i.e. the caller gets an IP number)
but there's no traffic.
Below you can find the files I changed in order to get
that setup w
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:32PM -0800, Dave Cornejo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a unique routing problem:
>
> local network is 192.168.1.0/24
>
> 192.168.1.4
> |
> |
> 192.168.1.1 -- ethernet -- 192.168.1.2 / global IP addr -- internet
>
you wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Cornejo wrote:
>
> > local network is 192.168.1.0/24
> >
> > 192.168.1.4
> > |
> > |
> > 192.168.1.1 -- ethernet -- 192.168.1.2 / global IP addr -- internet
> > |
> > |
> >
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Cornejo wrote:
> local network is 192.168.1.0/24
>
> 192.168.1.4
> |
> |
> 192.168.1.1 -- ethernet -- 192.168.1.2 / global IP addr -- internet
> |
> |
> 192.168.1.3
>
> now,
On 2003.01.29 21:34:50 +, Trent Nelson wrote:
> If I had to take a wild guess, I'd say that the keep-state setup
> rules added dynamically are expiring too quickly, and thus, subseq-
> uent traffic is hitting the ``deny tcp from any to any established''
> rule.
Yes this happens
Audsin wrote:
> I am Dev, doing my research in Centre for Telecommunications Research,
> King's college London. My research project involves evaluating the
> performance of MIP6 TCP in the presence of fragmentation and without
> fragmentation. I am using Kame MIP6 for Free BSD 4.4 and have configu
Hi,
I've got a unique routing problem:
local network is 192.168.1.0/24
192.168.1.4
|
|
192.168.1.1 -- ethernet -- 192.168.1.2 / global IP addr -- internet
|
|
192.168.1.3
now, the rules:
1) .1 may
Hi,
I'm using ipfw with dynamic rules, and I'm having problems. Consi-
der the following rules:
ipfw add check-state
ipfw add deny tcp from any to any established
ipfw add pass ip from me to any
ipfw add pass tcp from any to me ssh keep-state setup
Hi
First of all, sorry for the last mail I sent.
And now ... down to business:
Would it be possible to implement a feature in MPD which allows you to
create a node of type ng_ether instead of ng_iface to allow bridging the
client onto the network instead of routing it?
If so, is anyone up for i
Hi
Would it be possible to implement a feature in MPD which allows you to create a node
of type ng_ether instead of ng_iface to allow bridging the client onto the network
instead of routing it?
If so, is anyone up for implementing such a feature? (Perhaps IPX could be implemented
too?)
Respected Sir/ Madam
I am Dev, doing my research in Centre for Telecommunications Research,
King's college London. My research project involves evaluating the
performance of MIP6 TCP in the presence of fragmentation and without
fragmentation. I am using Kame MIP6 for Free BSD 4.4 and have conf
12 matches
Mail list logo