Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Eli Dart
Well, I noticed one thing from the tcpdump files -- in the 1492 case, your machine is sending a FIN to www.ssh.com. In the 1484 case, of course no FIN is sent. However, if you look at the 1492 tcpdump you'll see connection establishment, a packet sent to www.ssh.com (an http request I assume)

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Eli Dart
In reply to Rostislav Krasny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Thank you for your trying to help me. Your version of ppp.conf is very > similar to mine. I don't have LAN here, but only one box with FreeBSD > connected to the outside world through my ADSL modem. So ' set nat' and > ' set proxy' options are

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > look at the tcp mssfixup option in ppp This option is enabled by default in ppp, look what `man 8 ppp` says: [tcp]mssfixup Default: Enabled. This option tells ppp to adjust TCP SYN pack- ets so that the maximum receive segment size is not

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Julian Elischer
look at the tcp mssfixup option in ppp On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Gene Bomgardner wrote: > > > Here's my ppp.conf - the 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 > 0.0.0.0are the actual values used in the file. They bear no > relation to any IP addresses used in my network whatsoever. Why > they wo

Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP

2002-12-28 Thread Rostislav Krasny
--- Gene Bomgardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's my ppp.conf - the 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 > 0.0.0.0are the actual values used in the file. They bear no > relation to any IP addresses used in my network whatsoever. Why > they work; the /0 says there are no significant b