Andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have a Linksys WMP11 802.11b card running in hostap mode. Every now
>and then my wireless network dissappears. If I ssh into the box over a
>different interface everything looks OK. To get things going I run
>ifconfig wi0 down. The whole machines seems to
If your rules keep state, then ipfstat should display the saved states.
Otherwise, no, as nothing else will be aware of connections for frames
not directly to/from the box itself.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:33:49PM -0800, randall ehren wrote:
> let me make the grain a little bit finer:
> i have a
> netstat -n |grep EST |wc -l
thank you.
let me make the grain a little bit finer:
i have a freebsd box acting as a IPFilter bridge for a class c subnet - is
there any way i can view how many concurrent connections this machine is
handling?
netstat -s returns:
root@fw[~]% netstat -s
tcp:
netstat -n |grep EST |wc -l
If that's too much overhead, steal from the netstat source.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:18:54PM -0800, randall ehren wrote:
> is there a simple way to measure the amount of concurrent network (tcp)
> connections to a freebsd host?
--
Barney Wolff http://www.da
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 12/05/02 20:41:
Is there a reason that the broadcast flag is not set on the loopback
interface? It seems like it might be useful to allow applications that
use broadcast to continue to work even when loopback is the only
interface.
Your application shouldn't use bro
hi,
is there a simple way to measure the amount of concurrent network (tcp)
connections to a freebsd host?
also, not exactly related to freebsd, but is there a way to measure the
amount of concurrent connections while running ipfilter on the host?
thanks,
--
:// randall s. ehren
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Aniruddha Bohra wrote:
> Hello
> The following code snippet is from netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
>
> As in the comment (and presumably correct behaviour) a RST should
> be sent on close if the connection is embryonic. However,
> if (tp->t_state < TCPS_ESTABLISHED)
> tp = tcp_c
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:04:22PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> > "randall" == randall ehren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> randall> hasn't it been merged?
>
> Can't find any trace in the cvsweb interface :
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/bridge.c?f=u&only_with_tag=RELE
Is there a reason that the broadcast flag is not set on the loopback
interface? It seems like it might be useful to allow applications that
use broadcast to continue to work even when loopback is the only
interface.
-josh
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freeb
Pieter Westland wrote:
At home I am trying to set the following up properly:
laptop -- (wireless, ipsec) --- gateway (4.7 STABLE) -- (PPPoE) --
Internet
Laptop has 10.0.0.3, gateway has 10.0.0.1 on the internal sid, rl0.
...
setkey -c << EOF
spdadd 10.0.0.3 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec esp/
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 05:33 PM, Don Bowman wrote:
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[ ... ]
Yes, but the complicated internal routes maintained within
those networks isn't your problem if your machine or network isn't BGP
peering with them.
It is in the sense that I h
Hi,
At home I am trying to set the following up properly:
laptop -- (wireless, ipsec) --- gateway (4.7 STABLE) -- (PPPoE) -- Internet
Laptop has 10.0.0.3, gateway has 10.0.0.1 on the internal sid, rl0. Between
laptop and gateway the encrypted ipsec-connection (with racoon) works fine:
# setke
12 matches
Mail list logo
