can't get trpt to run

2002-11-13 Thread James B. Wilkinson
When I try to run trpt, it reports "no namelist". If I do "nm /kernel" I get an extensive namelist. At this point I have no idea where else to look. Does anybody here have any ideas? Kernel is 4.6.1-RC2. Thanks -- - Jimmy Wilkinson

natd woes with 4.7-RELEASE-p2

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Sierchio
I am running 4.7 on a firewall, with an extremely simple nat setup -- not all packets are passed through nat, as some services such as ntp and dnswall are handled on the firewall -- but for those packets that are nat'd, there are only static (redirect_address) rules. What happens is that, over ti

struct sockaddr_in - question

2002-11-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > My question is do I realy need to fill this? Or is it there just for > future use? That depends on what you will be using the length for. Some interfaces require that it be present; other interfaces (e.g., those system calls which already take a separate length argument) do not. -GAW

Re: if_ef doesn't work with if_fxp?

2002-11-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
'K, will try that out ... On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, John Hay wrote: > > > > Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally > > found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when > > I try to do: > > > > ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x > > > > and it gives m

Re: if_ef doesn't work with if_fxp?

2002-11-13 Thread John Hay
> > Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally > found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when > I try to do: > > ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x > > and it gives me back an 'interface does not exist' message ... I have ef > configured into the

if_ef doesn't work with if_fxp?

2002-11-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Morning ... Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when I try to do: ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x and it gives me back an 'interface does not exist' message ... I have ef configured into the kern

em0 under CURRENT

2002-11-13 Thread Petri Helenius
Just for the sake of it, I tried if the performance of em would be different under -CURRENT and it is. Initially when I had: optionsINVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity checking optionsINVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity checks of internal structures, required