When I try to run trpt, it reports "no namelist". If I do "nm
/kernel" I get an extensive namelist. At this point I have no idea
where else to look. Does anybody here have any ideas? Kernel is
4.6.1-RC2.
Thanks
--
-
Jimmy Wilkinson
I am running 4.7 on a firewall, with an extremely simple nat
setup -- not all packets are passed through nat, as some services
such as ntp and dnswall are handled on the firewall -- but
for those packets that are nat'd, there are only static (redirect_address)
rules.
What happens is that, over ti
< said:
> My question is do I realy need to fill this? Or is it there just for
> future use?
That depends on what you will be using the length for. Some
interfaces require that it be present; other interfaces (e.g., those
system calls which already take a separate length argument) do not.
-GAW
'K, will try that out ...
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, John Hay wrote:
> >
> > Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally
> > found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when
> > I try to do:
> >
> > ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x
> >
> > and it gives m
>
> Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally
> found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when
> I try to do:
>
> ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x
>
> and it gives me back an 'interface does not exist' message ... I have ef
> configured into the
Morning ...
Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally
found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when
I try to do:
ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x
and it gives me back an 'interface does not exist' message ... I have ef
configured into the kern
Just for the sake of it, I tried if the performance of em would be
different
under -CURRENT and it is. Initially when I had:
optionsINVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity
checking
optionsINVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity checks of internal
structures, required