In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Ok but there cound be netgraph nodes that have no hardware but could be
: called into creation by some external event.
: e.g. a netgraph hook on a pseudointerface like gif or tun.
: (not at present but a possi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:48:07PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Ok but there cound be netgraph nodes that have no hardware but could be
> called into creation by some external event.
> e.g. a netgraph hook on a pseudointerface like gif or tun.
> (not at present but a possibility I was looking
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :
> :
> : On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> :
> : > : 1) Device driver in Netgraph node. When hardware is
> : > :activated new Netgraph node is
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
:
: On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > : 1) Device driver in Netgraph node. When hardware is
: > :activated new Netgraph node is created and new
: > :kevent sent. devd (or something lik
Hi,
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:02:28 -0800
> Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mux> Sorry to ask you about this again, but I have no idea what to set as a
mux> prefix for xl0. Does 2002:5143:8351:2 sounds sane? The prefix for xl1
mux> is 2002:5143:8351:1 as you suggested.
Yes.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
> mux> Well, my interface which is connected to the net is xl1. The interface
> mux> connected to the local subnet is xl0. If I change rtadvd_interfaces to
> mux> xl1, ping6 on the box behind the router gets a no route to host while
> mux> the DNS lookup worked before,
Hi,
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:20:30 -0800
> Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mux> Well, my interface which is connected to the net is xl1. The interface
mux> connected to the local subnet is xl0. If I change rtadvd_interfaces to
mux> xl1, ping6 on the box behind the router gets a
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:25:34 -0800
> > Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> mux> However, it still doesn't seem to work properly. When pinging an IPv6
> mux> host from a box in my local subnet, I'm getting this warning on the box
> mux> running rt
Hi,
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:25:34 -0800
> Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mux> However, it still doesn't seem to work properly. When pinging an IPv6
mux> host from a box in my local subnet, I'm getting this warning on the box
mux> running rtadvd(8) :
mux> cannot forward src fe8
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> I don't really understand the reason why either the modem or the serial port would
>change their setting spontaneously.
You are right. They don't.
> Let's deal with the serial port: it's initialized at boot time by rc.serial, so a
>reboot should have set it up right.
>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : 1) Device driver in Netgraph node. When hardware is
> :activated new Netgraph node is created and new
> :kevent sent. devd (or something like devd) listens
> :for these events and does something (loads firmware,
> :activates device, e
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Archie Cobbs wri
> tes:
> >Oops, you're right.. sorry for the misinformation.
> >
> >Sounds like a bug to me (did Iasen file a PR?)
>
> kern/38872 already exists, and I'm sure there is a much older PR
> that also describes th
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:00:40 -0800
> > Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> mux> ipv6_enable="YES"
> mux> ipv6_defaultrouter="2002:c058:6301::" # Use this for 6to4 (RFC 3068)
> mux> ipv6_prefix_xl1="2002:5143:8351:"
> mux> stf_interface_ipv4ad
Hi,
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:00:40 -0800
> Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mux>ipv6_enable="YES"
mux>ipv6_defaultrouter="2002:c058:6301::" # Use this for 6to4 (RFC 3068)
mux>ipv6_prefix_xl1="2002:5143:8351:"
mux>stf_interface_ipv4addr="81.67.131.81"
It seems you
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Archie Cobbs wri
tes:
>Oops, you're right.. sorry for the misinformation.
>
>Sounds like a bug to me (did Iasen file a PR?)
kern/38872 already exists, and I'm sure there is a much older PR
that also describes this problem. Basically it is hard to fix because
the err
Harti Brandt writes:
> IK>> > As I experience system crushes at time of mbufs exhaustion I've compiled
> IK>> > a debug kernel and traced the problem. I seems the NFS functions
> IK>> > (nfsm_rpchead, nfsm_reqh ...) does *NOT* chek if they really have
> IK>> > allocated memory by MGET macro.
> IK
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> The specific problem with bpf is that one might have a half-full buffer
> of captured data when the select timeout hits. In that case the select
> returns with no FDs ready while I think it really should return with
> the bpf fd.
> I believe the select operation on bpf is not functioning as supposed to.
> I'm calling select with 100ms timeout. The bpf interface is listening to
> an interface with constant packet rate, so it's certain that multiple
> packets have been received during the select call. However the fd for
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:05:47PM +0300, Anton Vinokurov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am running FreeBSD 4.7-release and try to use ATEN UC10T USB-to-Ethernet
> adapter. Unfortunately it causes my system to print something like:
> kue0: watchdog timeout
> kue0: usb error on tx: TIMEOUT
> following by freez
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Iasen Kostov wrote:
IK>
IK>
IK>On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
IK>
IK>> Iasen Kostov writes:
IK>> > As I experience system crushes at time of mbufs exhaustion I've compiled
IK>> > a debug kernel and traced the problem. I seems the NFS functions
IK>> > (nfsm_rpchead, n
: 1) Device driver in Netgraph node. When hardware is
:activated new Netgraph node is created and new
:kevent sent. devd (or something like devd) listens
:for these events and does something (loads firmware,
:activates device, etc.)
Device drivers are not netgraph nodes. They will
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Iasen Kostov writes:
> > As I experience system crushes at time of mbufs exhaustion I've compiled
> > a debug kernel and traced the problem. I seems the NFS functions
> > (nfsm_rpchead, nfsm_reqh ...) does *NOT* chek if they really have
> > allocated m
HI net'ers !!
i read some message on the list archive and someone says that we can use
spoofing with ng
how can i do spooging with ng like this ???
WAN --- spoofer ( one ng node ) --- lan
THANX
_
The new MSN 8: advanced ju
Hi list;
i read NG manual and i cannot get something :
1. is NG just for FreeBSD nodes connection
2. is NG for p2p connection
3. can i use 2 Nodes like this ...
LAN ---TCP/IP---NG1---NG connection--NG2---TCP/IP-WAN
lan doesn't have the ng run on it and also WAN but between 2 ng-nodes i can
Hello,
I'm using FreeBSD for routing and shaping in my company.
Now, I have a problem: each time the pipe queue is full, the router sends : ICMP:
Source quench.
Please, help me to disable this message.
Looking forward to your reply,
Vladimir Girnet
"MEGADAT.COM" S.R.L.
MOLDOVA, Chisinau
www.
> I believe you're misunderstanding the meaning of the timeout in select(2).
> Timeout applies only when no FDs are ready.
The specific problem with bpf is that one might have a half-full buffer
of captured data when the select timeout hits. In that case the select
returns with no FDs ready whil
26 matches
Mail list logo
