Ah, the first entry into my procmail block regex from a freebsd list.
All the other s**theads are from nanog.
Good luck next time, fella.
--
Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Saturday, Oct 26, 2002, at 21:36 US/Pacific, Don Bowman wrote:
This can also be seen, believe it or not, on a routed
network, if you have something like spanning tree
protocol which hasn't converged yet, but has been set
for rapid convergence (which assumes the path isn't
a loop until it disc
On Saturday, Oct 26, 2002, at 20:24 US/Pacific, Julian Elischer wrote:
Don't get snooty..
the question is :"why do you want to do that?
Is it to get more bandwidth?
The answer is: None of your business. It was a simple technical
question, to which I was given a simple technical answer, which
> From: Julian Elischer [mailto:julian@;elischer.org]
(removed as to why have two NICs on the same network,
sending for general enlightenment of the list...)
This is reasonably common in L2 switched Ethernet. You have
a device which segments the traffic just fine with
MAC learning. You have the
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> On Saturday, Oct 26, 2002, at 16:20 US/Pacific, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Don Bowman wrote:
> >
> >> Kevin Stevens wrote:
> >>> I have two systems connected through a common network (switch). They
> >>> each have two NI
On Saturday, Oct 26, 2002, at 16:20 US/Pacific, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Don Bowman wrote:
Kevin Stevens wrote:
I have two systems connected through a common network (switch). They
each have two NICs, with one addressed on one IP network and the
second
on another. IP wo
This is common with l2 switched networks: the arp is seen everywhere even
though the unicast traffic uses the learning mode.
--don
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Don Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: 'Kevin Stevens' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Don Bowman wrote:
> Kevin Stevens wrote:
> > I have two systems connected through a common network (switch). They
> > each have two NICs, with one addressed on one IP network and the second
> > on another. IP works fine. My problem is that the kernel keeps
> > bitching
On Saturday, Oct 26, 2002, at 14:28 US/Pacific, Don Bowman wrote:
systcl net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0
Gee, why didn't that permutation of keystrokes occur to me? ;)
Thanks.
KeS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the me
Kevin Stevens wrote:
> I have two systems connected through a common network (switch). They
> each have two NICs, with one addressed on one IP network and the second
> on another. IP works fine. My problem is that the kernel keeps
> bitching about seeing the same MAC addresses on both interfa
I have two systems connected through a common network (switch). They
each have two NICs, with one addressed on one IP network and the second
on another. IP works fine. My problem is that the kernel keeps
bitching about seeing the same MAC addresses on both interfaces:
Oct 26 06:15:03 babelfi
Thomas Gielfeldt writes:
> I have gotten them all to work, and all hosts can see each other. There's only one
>thing which
> doesn't work... Broadcast packets...
Of course, because broadcast packets are not routed.
You might try configuring both sides to be on the same subnet (but
with non-confl
gosh there are almost too many ways to do this..
I use mpd, connected by a UDP tunnel over IPSEC
I use mpd for it's multilink capability, and have multiple UDP
tunnels, connected via different ISPs, so if one goes down
it only degrades my link rather than cutting it..
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Thomas
Hi
I'm trying to set up a VPN connection between two freebsd gateways.
What I want to do is to setup a connection between the two gateways, so that all the
hosts on the
two networks are connected to each other, as if they physically were on one network.
Below is a schematic of my network setup
It really was a newbie question - sorry for the bandwidth. If anyone
else wonders, email me and I'll help!
/Robert Staflin
On lördag, okt 26, 2002, at 23:03 Europe/Stockholm, Robert Staflin
wrote:
I'm developing an application to set the interface to use for
different IP addresses, e.g. if I
I had the lovely privilege of receiving an exorbitantly large amount
of traffic that was sent to one host (not a DoS) and the box held up
rather well until I slapped a cap on the particular machine. mbuf
cluster usage went from around 8K to healthy 65536 in about 15sec.
Now that things have levele
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 06:25:44PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote:
> I have a machine running 4.7. I can panic it by sending a reasonably
> high load of tcp open/close from/to it. The trace below is from
> a socket from localhost to localhost (sendmail). The max number
> of open file descriptors I would h
17 matches
Mail list logo
