On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:47:30PM -0700, Michael C. Wu wrote:
> Hi Luigi and Darren,
>
> Regarding IPFW2 and IPF, do you have plans on implementing a DAWG algorithm
> for the pattern matching? (Directed Acyclic Word Graphs)
my quick answer is no -- it might be interesting stuff, but
have t
Hi Luigi and Darren,
Regarding IPFW2 and IPF, do you have plans on implementing a DAWG algorithm
for the pattern matching? (Directed Acyclic Word Graphs)
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/crochemore99fast.html
It is a new algorithm that does super fast multiple stream/pattern
matching in a
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone know of an in-kernel traffic generator similar to UDPgen
>
>(http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/sebastian.zander/private/udpgen/)
>
> for Linux? Userland traffic generators have high overheads with small
> packets at
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:18:42AM +1000, Christopher Smith wrote:
...
> Ok, so any of the network benching products that can spit out a stream of
> UDP traffic should suffice ?
i presume so, yes. I have some tweaks in the kernel to duplicate packets
in the kernel and get higher peak rates, but t
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
>>anyone know of an in-kernel traffic generator similar to UDPgen
>>(http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/sebastian.zander/private/udpgen/)
>
>>for Linux? Userland traffic generators have high overheads with small
>>packets at Gigabit speeds.
>
< said:
> anyone know of an in-kernel traffic generator similar to UDPgen
>
>(http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/sebastian.zander/private/udpgen/)
>
> for Linux? Userland traffic generators have high overheads with small
> packets at Gigabit speeds.
I wrote one a long time a
On 10/10/02 10:00 AM, "Luigi Rizzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:38:40AM +1000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> ...
>> With the 2.4GHz 2650 we have currently, er, "borrowed" to do some testing
>> with, the load is down to 35% or so (highest I've seen it is 40%) and the
>> pa
Hi,
anyone know of an in-kernel traffic generator similar to UDPgen
(http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/sebastian.zander/private/udpgen/)
for Linux? Userland traffic generators have high overheads with small
packets at Gigabit speeds.
(If not, netgraph should allow an easy wa
On 10/10/02 9:26 AM, "Andre Oppermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[chomp]
> He probably can't tell because of the 32bit ifstats counters. They
> wrap every other minute on a well loaded Gigabit card.
A 'systat -ip 1' shows rates ranging from 120kpps to 250kpps, averaging
around the 150 - 180 ra
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> my general attitude is that when you are hitting 100% cpu
> utilization, small performance improvements such as those
> deriving from m_getcl() are not relevant, and you might
> want to restructure your sw in order to get substantial
> performance improvements.
>
> In the
On 9/10/2002 6:20 PM, "Attila Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
[chomp]
> and
> sys/kern/kern_poll.c:
> [...]
> #ifdef SMP
> #include "opt_lint.h"
> #ifndef COMPILING_LINT
> #error DEVICE_POLLING is not compatible with SMP
> #endif
> #endif
> [...]
>
> (no SMP support)
This I can live
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:29:50PM +0300, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why is it not allowed to get more that 65536 ip6fw rules from the kernel
> in the ip6fw.c:list() function?
i think it is just an oversight -- perhaps the author though that
each rule had to have its own number.
I'm trying to something a little bizarre with routing, so I suppose it
bears some explanation. I recently purchased one of those all-in-one
firewall/NAT/ethernet switch/801.11b access point boxes for my home use.
802.11b security being what it is (useless), I'm planning on setting up
IPSec for my
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> than move to a different board, or use polling (i have polling
> patches for the intel gigabit adapter)
If you mean em(4) - I'd love to test them :-)
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> USC Information Sciences Institute
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Crypto
yatin chalke wrote:
>
> I want to get hardware address of any machine on a
> subnet using sysctl and routing sockets.
> I can search arp cache and return the hardware address
> if it is there.
I'm not 100% sure I understand what you want to do, but using nmap (or
similar) to scan the subnet sho
my general attitude is that when you are hitting 100% cpu
utilization, small performance improvements such as those
deriving from m_getcl() are not relevant, and you might
want to restructure your sw in order to get substantial
performance improvements.
In the specific case, at least reading from
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 08:37:30AM -0600, Andy wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:49:51PM +0300, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I'm trying to make a VPN tunnel between a FreeBSD machine and a Win2K
> >Machine. My configuration is:
> >
> >{Net1} <---> <--...--> <---> {Net2}
> >
> >
>On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:49:51PM +0300, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to make a VPN tunnel between a FreeBSD machine and a Win2K
>Machine. My configuration is:
>
>{Net1} <---> <--...--> <---> {Net2}
>
>Win2k machine has dynamically assigned IP address as it's connecting to
>p
Hi,
I want to get hardware address of any machine on a
subnet using sysctl and routing sockets.
I can search arp cache and return the hardware address
if it is there.
But if the hardware address is not in ARP cache then I
cant retrieve it.
Is there any way to get hardware address of any
machine
For archival purposes...
He has a DLink router, which was handling the PPPoE itself, and using
DHCP for the LAN behind it. We took out the PPP configuration, put in
DHCP (ifconfig_dc0="DHCP"), and it's all up and running.
- Damian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:49:51PM +0300, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to make a VPN tunnel between a FreeBSD machine and a Win2K
> Machine. My configuration is:
>
> {Net1} <---> <--...--> <---> {Net2}
>
> Win2k machine has dynamically assigned IP address as it's connecting
Hello,
I'm trying to make a VPN tunnel between a FreeBSD machine and a Win2K
Machine. My configuration is:
{Net1} <---> <--...--> <---> {Net2}
Win2k machine has dynamically assigned IP address as it's connecting to
public ISP. Can you help me build the tunnel?
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
To
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Christopher Smith wrote:
> No, we use IPFilter (and that definitely isn't going to change any time
> soon).
Oh. Hm, maybe IPFilter 4.0 will be faster.
What you might consider doing is profiling the kernel on your test system
to see where the majority of the cpu time is g
Hello,
> You might want to try out some of the Intel gigabit boards. At least
> we've got an engineer from Intel who maintains the driver.
I'm far from being a FreeBSD expert, but Luigi Rizzo's polling patch
helped me a lot in similar cases to get better performance.
>From POLLING(4):
DESCRIPTI
24 matches
Mail list logo
