On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:51:16AM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2002 17:28:37 -0700
> "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:39:36PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have a small problem with IPFW
> > >
> > > How can I han
Hi!
Looks like nfs_socket.c and nfs_syscalls.c lack strings
sopt.sopt_dir = SOPT_SET;
when setting TCP_NODELAY and SO_KEEPALIVE. For SO_KEEPALIVE, it doesn't
matter, sosetopt() doesn't examine it, but TCP_NODELAY is actually
ignored.
Obviously, it's easy to add these lines, but maybe i
On Wed, 22 May 2002 17:28:37 -0700
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:39:36PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have a small problem with IPFW
> >
> > How can I handle adding and removing rules based on IP/MAC per user?
>
> Per user? You mean
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:31:00PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:43:23AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I think the TOS matching is implemented in ipfw in 5.0, not 4.6.
> >
> > it should not be too hard to merge it into RELENG_4.
> >
> > cheers
> > luigi
>
>
I was just wondering why the src address is set to the host group in
outgoing multicast packets on RELENG_4? As far as I can tell, rfc1054
says that the src address should be set to that of the host, not the
host group (6.2). The behavior exists in 4.5-release also.
I noticed this because linux
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:39:36PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a small problem with IPFW
>
> How can I handle adding and removing rules based on IP/MAC per user?
Per user? You mean with 'uid' options?
> I can add a rule for a specific IP/MAC without the need to flush but can
when a dummynet queue drops UDP packets, it returns an ENOBUF
error on the write(), so you can at least retry the transmission
yourself after some time.
Unfortunately there is not any mechanism in place to make an UDP
write() blocking.
cheers
luigi
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 05:42:
i need some help with a routing problem i face.
below is my setup.
|
|
10.0.0.1 firewall/router
|
_ _ _ _ |_ _ _ _ _
| |
|10.0.0.2 |10.0.0.3
Desktop1 Desktop2
10.0.1.1
I'm curious: what would be the best method of implementing a bandwith limiter
on an interface that is lossless? I'm having to limit UDP with no back channel,
so I can't reply on TCP retransmits to make up for packets being dropped.
DUMMYNET drops packets that overflow it's queue size so it doesn'
It's actually fairly easy to take the output of netstat -inb and put
it into rrdtool. If you grep Link out of netstat -inb you get in and
out packets and bytes, and you get error counters as well.
My $0.02
--eli
In reply to Larry Sica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> This is a multi
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:43:23AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I think the TOS matching is implemented in ipfw in 5.0, not 4.6.
>
> it should not be too hard to merge it into RELENG_4.
>
> cheers
> luigi
Cool! Could you merge this stuff into RELENG_4, or are there more
restrictions
Ivo,
Looks like your question is specific to Squid rather than FreeBSD.
Please see Squid FAQ at www.squid-cache.org and ACL-related comments
in the default squid.conf file. The info you need is there. If you
need further help, please post to squid-users mailing list, after
searching its archive.
Hi,
I need to filter some kind of traffic –
mp3, .avi and so on for the my network users. I’d try to find some info
on that, but with no success. Is there some kind of acl or other rule that can
help? Can you help me with this problem, please?
Thank you in advantage
Ivo
MTRG in conjunction with snmpd. It will gather the data you require. Also,
you can safely run SNMPD as a non root user for this purpose and I strongly
advise that. Both programs are in the ports tree.
---Mike
On Tue, 21 May 2002 14:58:22 +0300, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
