Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 10:25:18AM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> [snip]
>
>
>>Back to problem of NFS over UDP -- it's not so stateless, is it? ;-)
>>Remote disk access is mostly bulk transfer operations anyway,
>
>
> A _lot_ of remote disk access is not bulk transfer
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 10:25:18AM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
[snip]
> Back to problem of NFS over UDP -- it's not so stateless, is it? ;-)
> Remote disk access is mostly bulk transfer operations anyway,
A _lot_ of remote disk access is not bulk transfers, but file status
information.
--
C
Terry Lambert wrote:
> UDP is still a bad bet for reliable request response. It's
> really dumb to effectively reimplement TCP without windows on
> top of UDP just to avoid using TCP.
Speaking as someone who has implemented reliable message protocols
over UDP about a dozen times, I can affirm T
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Matthias Kranz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We try to start a PC in a different subnet through using a
> WakeOnLan. The packet is addressed to the broadcast address of the
> client PC net. The FreeBSD router in between does not forward this
> packet. I read that F
