On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 23:02:55 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020517 22:40] wrote:
> >
> > I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
> > from today (May 17th, 2002).
> >
> > The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt c
* Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020517 22:40] wrote:
>
> I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
> from today (May 17th, 2002).
>
> The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt changes that Alan Cox made in
> kern_subr.c. (They conflicted a bit with the
Barry Irwin writes:
> On another point, I spent a couple of days hacking around with the Nortel
> Client and didnt have much success :< would be great to hear if you do
It is not normally possible to get the Nortel client to work with
non-Nortel IPSec servers because they purposefully mangle the
I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
from today (May 17th, 2002).
The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt changes that Alan Cox made in
kern_subr.c. (They conflicted a bit with the zero copy receive code.)
The patches and the FAQ are available here:
h
Attila Nagy wrote:
> Although I'm not a coder myself, I would also look for the way to patch
> the "em" driver (if "gx" is already in the initial plan), because it
> reportedly works better (for example I couldn't do NFS serving with UDP
> packets bigger than the MTU with that, while the "em" driv
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Kenjiro Cho wrote:
> ECN support in TCP is independent from ALTQ, and it can be done
> separately.
> An ECN patch for 4.5 which doesn't require ALTQ is included in
> altq-3.1. It's been in KAME since December.
> If there are interests, I can make a patch for -current.
Pers
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Barry Irwin wrote:
> B [client] - {internet} - [vpngw] - [server]
It would be a tunnel like B. The "[vpngw]" on the client side is software
running on the client. The "[vpngw]" on the other side is a contivity
switch. I'm trying to reach servers on the other side of the c
Jimmy,
Take a look at http://www.netlab.ohio-state.edu/cise/
On Thursday 16 May 2002 08:41 pm, you wrote:
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 20:24:45 -0400
> From: "James B. Wilkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: (unknown)
>
> I've got to teach a new graduate course in networking this fall. I'm
>
Hello,
> ECN support in TCP is independent from ALTQ, and it can be done
> separately. An ECN patch for 4.5 which doesn't require ALTQ is included
> in altq-3.1. It's been in KAME since December. If there are interests,
> I can make a patch for -current.
I think it would be very good to catch u
On Thu 2002-05-16 (09:30), Matthew Zahorik wrote:
> I am unclear regarding spdadd arguments and my VPN setup.
>
> I'm attempting to replace Nortel's Contivity Extranet Client on Windows
> with a racoon/ipsec solution.
>
> I'm unsure if this is a "tunnel" or "transport" connection.
>
> I
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Attila Nagy wrote:
> > >We have started a "ALTQ integration in FreeBSD" project which is
> > > headed towards integrating Mr. Kejiro's ALTQ framework into FreeBSD
> > > 5.0-current (and perhaps 4-stable later). The FreeBSD Core Team has been
> >
Hi,
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >We have started a "ALTQ integration in FreeBSD" project which is
> > headed towards integrating Mr. Kejiro's ALTQ framework into FreeBSD
> > 5.0-current (and perhaps 4-stable later). The FreeBSD Core Team has been
> > advised and we have receive
Hello,
>We have started a "ALTQ integration in FreeBSD" project which is
> headed towards integrating Mr. Kejiro's ALTQ framework into FreeBSD
> 5.0-current (and perhaps 4-stable later). The FreeBSD Core Team has been
> advised and we have received on principle approval. We are looking for
>
On Fri 2002-05-17 (13:48), Chih-Chang Hsieh wrote:
> Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Chih-Chang Hsieh writes:
> >
> >>Could someone tell us how to assign a local address for
> >>racoon to bind? Because the 3-IP box's outgoing interface
> >>is assigned by a private IP which connects to a router.
> >>But w
14 matches
Mail list logo
