Creating a route entry with -cloning flag and the -genmask
option causes a kernel panic on 4.5-STABLE.
The cloned entry created is a network route. The problem
appears to be in route.c, in "rtrequest1" function, where
if (!(rt->rt_flags & RTF_HOST) && (rt_mask(rt) !=0)
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Brian Candler wrote:
>perl -e 'for ($i=0;$i<1000;$i++) { open F,"; close F;}'
I will assume that you wrote this *only* to prove the point. However, if
you are using NFS, you need to check the status of both open *and* close.
Otherwise you are likely to start breeding *v
> George,
>
> I believe netstat already utilizes the sysctl API to get information about
> the TCP and UDP control blocks for state information. The modules for tcp
> and udp already contain sysctl backend routines that do this. Additionally,
> there is implementation for the ip_divertlist and
George,
I believe netstat already utilizes the sysctl API to get information about
the TCP and UDP control blocks for state information. The modules for tcp
and udp already contain sysctl backend routines that do this. Additionally,
there is implementation for the ip_divertlist and the raw CBs
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020426 10:48] wrote:
> > We have a sysctl that takes the four tuple as an argument, which can
> > be got from netstat -an output. It is used only for deleting a
> > connection not modifying it.
> >
> > for e.g
> > sysctl net.inet.tcp.deleteconn="a.b.
* Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020426 10:15] wrote:
>
> Now, there is obviously some "consistency" issue to beware of. Are there any
> NFS gurus out there who can say why it is necessary to clear the attribute
> cache on _every_ open? Could it safely be made less restrictive, e.g. don't
> c
> We have a sysctl that takes the four tuple as an argument, which can
> be got from netstat -an output. It is used only for deleting a
> connection not modifying it.
>
> for e.g
> sysctl net.inet.tcp.deleteconn="a.b.c.d:80:x.y.z.w:3".
>
> netstat -Aan gives us the tcp control block addres
Mike Silbersack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020425 20:02] wrote:
> > > Hey Folks,
> > >
> > > I was just wondering if anyone had considered making it possible to
> > > control PCBs from the sysc
t invalidate the cache unless the
file has been modified. However that doesn't help much if the cache is going
to get invalidated anyway the next time the file is opened :-)
Many thanks,
Brian Candler.
P.S. I am working to FreeBSD-4.5-STABLE-20020426
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:01:39PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> When did this change? "const char *ptr" used to mean that the thing
> pointed to cannot be changed, but the pointer itself can be. So far
> as I know, it still does. Educate me, please, if that's no longer so.
>
> On Fri, Apr 26,
When did this change? "const char *ptr" used to mean that the thing
pointed to cannot be changed, but the pointer itself can be. So far
as I know, it still does. Educate me, please, if that's no longer so.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:44:27PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > 3. Double `const'
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:36:57PM +0800, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:16:20PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 06:04:47PM +0800, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'd like to know your opinion about this patch
> > >
> > > htt
Does anyone know of any 8 port or better ethernet cards? The ideal
card (IMO) would be:
o Plug into a PCI slot
o At least 8 ports
o The 8 ports would not be on the mounting bracket, but would
instead be externally mounted (ideally, with a rackmount
front panel
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:16:20PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 06:04:47PM +0800, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'd like to know your opinion about this patch
> >
> > http://www.morning.ru/~poige/patchzone/ingressfiltering.patch
> >
> > which is mine
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 06:04:47PM +0800, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to know your opinion about this patch
>
> http://www.morning.ru/~poige/patchzone/ingressfiltering.patch
>
> which is mine attempt to implement an ingress filter being inspired by
> RFC2827 "Network Ingre
15 matches
Mail list logo
