Re: Putting all PCBs into sysctl?

2002-04-25 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020425 20:02] wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > > > I was just wondering if anyone had considered making it possible to > > control PCBs from the sysctl interface? I'm not completely familiar with > > sysct

Re: Putting all PCBs into sysctl?

2002-04-25 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020425 20:02] wrote: > Hey Folks, > > I was just wondering if anyone had considered making it possible to > control PCBs from the sysctl interface? I'm not completely familiar with > sysctl yet, is it possible to add information to the database

Putting all PCBs into sysctl?

2002-04-25 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
Hey Folks, I was just wondering if anyone had considered making it possible to control PCBs from the sysctl interface? I'm not completely familiar with sysctl yet, is it possible to add information to the database dynamically? It would be nice to be able to disconnect, or modify

RE: pxeboot and realtek 8139

2002-04-25 Thread McKenna, Lee
Answering my own question here ;) I had to go into the BIOS on the SV-24 (FV-24 motherboard) and set: Assign IRQ to VGA: NO Assign IRQ to USB: NO Now, pxeboot works wonderfully on the built-in RealTek 8139. Woo-Hoo! --Lee > -Original Message- > From: McKenna, Lee > Sent: Friday, A

Re: why prefer old SA in KAME's IPSec?

2002-04-25 Thread Shoichi Sakane
> but freebsd use old SA. After searching maillist, I > found that net.key.prefered_oldsa=0 will solve that > problem. But why prefer old one? the reason is for backword compatibility. you can use new one by the system wide default as you know. early kame implementation always used old one accor