Re: How can I use ng bpf

2002-04-11 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:26:25AM +0200, Yidan Zhou wrote: > Hi all, > I want to set up a bridge with filtering function on Freebsd. I checked > some webpages which mention that I can ng_bpf to implement filtering. But > the freebsd man page of ng_bpf is not clear(especially, how to use ngctl t

Re: Bug in m_split() ?

2002-04-11 Thread Terry Lambert
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > it does _exactly_ the same thing as patch i sent. the idea is > to set "n->m_len" to zero. in this particular part of the code > "n" is not modified. only "n->m_next". so i do not see any > difference except your patch is 4 lines :) Yours is less efficient. -- Terry

Re: mpd PPTP and NAT

2002-04-11 Thread tang hongbin
It it true that MPD server think that all clients behind a NAT server have the same IP address(external address). It doesn't allow more than one client behind a NAT server to connect with it at one time. One solution is that NAT server supports RSIP protocol. for further info, please refer RFC RS

Re: mpd PPTP and NAT

2002-04-11 Thread Archie Cobbs
Elliott Perrin writes: > that is exactly what I am seeing, the clients are behind this stupid > little GVC IP0008 machine, and I am using your mpd software for the pptp > server. I know about the "BUG" in libalias. > > Is this part of the PPTP spec, that only one TCP control connection can be > o

Re: Bug in m_split() ?

2002-04-11 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello Jeffrey, > Please try out this patch instead. > > Index: uipc_mbuf.c > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v > retrieving revision 1.90 > diff -u -6 -r1.90 uipc_mbuf.c > --- uipc_mbuf.c 5 Feb 2002 02:00

Re: networking fact checking for book

2002-04-11 Thread Michael Lucas
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:43:44PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Michael Lucas wrote: > > > OK, damn fool question here, but our docs are not entirely consistent > > on this and I need to be sure before I send this book to the printer. > > Rather than trawl through the s

Re: networking fact checking for book

2002-04-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Michael Lucas wrote: > OK, damn fool question here, but our docs are not entirely consistent > on this and I need to be sure before I send this book to the printer. > Rather than trawl through the source code for hours and get it wrong, > I'm asking here. > > net.inet.

Re: mpd PPTP and NAT

2002-04-11 Thread Elliott Perrin
that is exactly what I am seeing, the clients are behind this stupid little GVC IP0008 machine, and I am using your mpd software for the pptp server. I know about the "BUG" in libalias. Is this part of the PPTP spec, that only one TCP control connection can be open to an IP, or is it a purely lib

Re: mpd PPTP and NAT

2002-04-11 Thread Archie Cobbs
Elliott Perrin writes: > I was wondering if it is possible to have multiple systems behind a NAT > connect to an mpd PPTP system. If there is a config trick to do so, or > someone has figured out a way. > > The clients are not sitting behind a BSD box, or i would just create a > PPTP tunnel betwe

mpd PPTP and NAT

2002-04-11 Thread Elliott Perrin
Hello, I am not on the -net list so please include me in any responses. I was wondering if it is possible to have multiple systems behind a NAT connect to an mpd PPTP system. If there is a config trick to do so, or someone has figured out a way. The clients are not sitting behind a BSD box, or

networking fact checking for book

2002-04-11 Thread Michael Lucas
Folks, OK, damn fool question here, but our docs are not entirely consistent on this and I need to be sure before I send this book to the printer. Rather than trawl through the source code for hours and get it wrong, I'm asking here. net.inet.tcp.sendspace= bits or bytes? While I think I know t