On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:25:33PM -0500, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:44PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
> >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wro
>On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:44PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
>>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>>>
>>> You MIGHT be able to use ipfw divert/pipe rules to somehow sh
Brooks Davis wrote:
> The following patch reverts a previous API change which change the
> return value of a clonable interfaces' destory function from void to
> int to allow the interface to refuse to delete a unit. Since we now
> manage unit creation in the generic cloning code and the only use
Hi all,
is the moxa c101/isa (HD64570)
supersync board supported?
Thanks,
tomas
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:35:45PM -0500, alexus wrote:
> can someone explain me what does it means? i get this in my syslog
>
> /kernel: arplookup xx.xxx.x.xx failed: could not allocate llinfo
> /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for xx.xxx.x.xxrt
>
This usually indicates for a misconfi
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>
> ...I'm getting some severe deja vu with this topic. But I can't recall
> what the exact subject was previously.
I once described a flow manager that did similar.. queuing the return acks
per session to ensure that some sessions didn't over-run oth
