On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 17:35:56 -0800
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> > > I was wondering why the FreeBSD core team would think
> > > of including the vrrp daemon and loadd to the distribution
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> > > I was wondering why the FreeBSD core team would think
> > > of including the vrrp daemon and loadd to the distribution or let
> > > the author of this c
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> > I was wondering why the FreeBSD core team would think
> > of including the vrrp daemon and loadd to the distribution or let
> > the author of this commit his source for peer reviewing
> ...
> > Maybe it
Hello,
I'm doing research into performance metrics, and I've found that SNMP
(net-snmp 4.2.3 and net-snmp 5.0pre2) isn't reporting tcpCurrEstab on
FreeBSD 4.2, it always resports zero no matter how many connections are
actually in ESTABLISHED.
tcp.tcpCurrEstab.0 = Gauge32: 0
>From the two versi
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002 14:29:02 -0800
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> > Having this as part of the system would ensure that
> > the integration and future update of the vrppd or loadd
> > would be supported and also that its usage would become
> > more common ,
Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> Having this as part of the system would ensure that
> the integration and future update of the vrppd or loadd
> would be supported and also that its usage would become
> more common , self-inducing a greater amount of support
> for users and better documentation etc..
Having this as part of the system would ensure that
the integration and future update of the vrppd or loadd
would be supported and also that its usage would become
more common , self-inducing a greater amount of support
for users and better documentation etc etc...
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002 14:10:
Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> I was wondering why the FreeBSD core team would think
> of including the vrrp daemon and loadd to the distribution or let
> the author of this commit his source for peer reviewing
...
> Maybe it need to be integrated into current and then backported
> to stable (has i
I was wondering why the FreeBSD core team would think
of including the vrrp daemon and loadd to the distribution or let
the author of this commit his source for peer reviewing
I think the author has asked for this to several people
of the FreeBSD team already. This kind of work is much needed
IMH
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:00:20AM -0500, Peter Brezny wrote:
>
> Thank everyone for the background.
>
> So as far as load on natd is concerned, which is better:
no idea. As long as you keep the public ip of the NAT host itself
distinct from the public IP of the natted hosts, there should
be an
Hi there.this is a repost of an earlier message.didnt
get replies to that one.maybe probably i posted on a
sunday:-).trying my luck again.
i was trying to create a gateway having one
ethernet card(10.0.0.2) and a wireless nic(10.0.1.1).
I wanted this gateway to act between a
laptop(10.0.1.5) and
no i don't.
Vinod
--- Vladimir Terziev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have active firewall on your gateway?
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:28:39 -0800 (PST)
> Vinod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi there. i was trying to create a gateway having
> one
> > ethernet card(10.0.0.2) and a wire
Thank everyone for the background.
So as far as load on natd is concerned, which is better:
All private networks translated through one public ip address (about 5 class
c networks total)
or
A separate public ip for each private network to be translated through.
Thanks again for your help.
P
Actually, following other reports on natd performance trashing under
load and with time, I am under the impression that the library used
by natd (libalias ?) might use some heavyweight data structure
(such as linear lists, or hash tables which saturate too early)
to lookup sessions.
The bug menti
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 08:06:16PM -0500, Peter Brezny wrote:
> I've got a system acting as a router for about 1000 users behind various
> private networks who are currently all routed through a pII 400 with 512M
> ram.
>
> Currently all of these private networks are translated through one public
15 matches
Mail list logo
