Julian Elischer writes:
> > I solved my own problem... it turns out that my naming conventions caused
> > an issue when MPD labelled the PPP node. It truncated the bundle names at
> > 8 characters, and since mine were 8 characters plus a number following the
> > truncated names for all the links
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Ryan Morris wrote:
> I solved my own problem... it turns out that my naming conventions caused
> an issue when MPD labelled the PPP node. It truncated the bundle names at
> 8 characters, and since mine were 8 characters plus a number following the
> truncated names for all
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> Since I have a single nic card I invoke the following:
> routed -s
> I also have used the flags -P pm_rdisc and -P rdisc_interval=45, but I think
> that's irrelevant at this moment.
As someone else noted, you'll need ripv2.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Since I have a single nic card I invoke the following:
routed -s
I also have used the flags -P pm_rdisc and -P rdisc_interval=45, but I think
that's irrelevant at this moment.
Also I do not have any firewalling enabled.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Sierchio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Hi,
Can you recommend me HSSI and sync. serian cards (V.35) for FreeBSD with
support of Frame-Relay and HDLC
regards,
Mihail Balikov
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
When trying to set queue size (>100) with ipfw,
I found ipfw actually hard-coded the queue size limit to 100.
I am trying to simulation network link with very high delay and relatively
low bandwidth. However, I don't want to suffer packet drops. So I need a
large queue size.
Can anyone tell me w
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
Well, on a shared link layer network...
> Now I like to turn on Routed, and have the approperiate routes discovered.
what options are you invoking routed with? do you have firewall enabled?
T
As I have said before. RIP (routed) won't announce a 10.x.x.x network
address, regardless of your VLSM netmask, as anything but 255.0.0.0,
i.e. 10/8.
You may be able to work around this using RIPv2. I haven't played with
FreeBSD's implementation of it. Otherwise, using RIPv1, try using
several di
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:56:05AM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hi
>
> would it be possible to add a date statement
> in the "icmp-response bandwidth limit" written
> in the console to better track such problem ?
That's what syslogd(8) is for. If you are using a default
syslog.conf(5), those mes
I'm making a new post to attach the network diagram in order to clarify my
question.
I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
+-+
|10.1.1.1/24 |
| +--+
| | |
+-+ |
|
+-+ |
|10.1.1.
I solved my own problem... it turns out that my naming conventions caused
an issue when MPD labelled the PPP node. It truncated the bundle names at
8 characters, and since mine were 8 characters plus a number following the
truncated names for all the links were identical, and it refused to load
t
This is also something that it could be used with :
http://www.worldspace.com/
--
===
Christophe Prevotaux Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEXANET SARLURL: http://www.hexanet.fr/
Z.A.C Les Char
On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 18:15:29 -0800
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> >
> > If someone is willing to reintegrate all of this
> > in FreeBSD Stable or Current in order to have
> > native UDLR support on FreeBSD.
> >
> > http://www-sop.inria.fr/rodeo/person
Yes I have ,but Emmanuel Duros is now running
a company called UDCAST that makes its money
off using UDLR.So they are not willing to
contribute to FreeBSD any code other than what
they have already contributed while at INRIA
On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:20:56 -0800
Michael Sierchio <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 12:36:49PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For my diploma exam I will study the state of QoS in today's
> networking and further directions and I probably will concentrate on
> ALTQ in FreeBSD (as I'm pretty familiar w/ FreeBSD).
>
> I see that most of today'
Hi
would it be possible to add a date statement
in the "icmp-response bandwidth limit" written
in the console to better track such problem ?
Thanks a lot.
--
Frank Bonnet
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
16 matches
Mail list logo