Hi, I am implementing a small BSD socket layer
which supports only the AF_INET family. I am wondering whether recvmsg()
and sendmsg() calls are required for the INET protocol family. I don't know if I
should implemented it or not. I have looked up some open source projects and
grepped for re
Marcel de Vries writes:
> Please everybody is free to fix the patch below, because my C poor as hell.
Thanks for the patch, I've included it in the next version.
-Archie
__
Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * htt
Ack! I just migrated my primary DNS from one machine (ds10.honeypot.net) to
another (kanga.honeypot.net), both running FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE. I'm trying
to serve the honeypot.net domain. Here is the entry from named.conf:
zone "honeypot.net" {
type master;
file "db/db.honeyp
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:43:57AM -0600, Hamilton Hoover wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm setting up a site that I'd like to have four separate networks connected
>
> through a single gateway/firewall with five network interfaces.
>
> Two Public (real IPs) interfaces on the same network with different
Hi all,
I'm setting up a site that I'd like to have four separate networks connected
through a single gateway/firewall with five network interfaces.
Two Public (real IPs) interfaces on the same network with different IPs
realIP1
realIP2
Three Private (fake IPS) interfaces on three separate net
Hi all,
I'm setting up a site that I'd like to have four separate networks connected
through a single gateway/firewall with five network interfaces.
Two Public (real IPs) interfaces on the same network with different IPs
realIP1
realIP2
Three Private (fake IPS) interfaces on three separate net
Hi,
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:20:57 +1100
> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
edwin> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:38:28PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> Finally I figured out the problem.
edwin> Thanks for these two patches, it works like a charm now!
I just commit
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>Now since the default ruleset is to deny everything, the client
>locks up spewing 'nfsd send error 13'.
>
>Now give it two or three shots and you may get the server
>to lock up as well! (seems to run out of mbufs)
I must have forgotten to
If anyone is interested, take this scenario:
NFS client and server set up
client is doing this:
tar cf - /path/to/nfs/mount | tar -xvf -
idiot sysadmin (me) does this on client:
kldload ipfw
Now since the default ruleset is to deny everything, the client
locks up spewing 'nfsd send error
Hi all,
The problem I had with 'no buffer available' messages is solved.
Mpd seemed to be the problem. I'm using pptpclient-1.0.3 at this very
moment, tested my mxstream ADSL inet connection in all kinds of ways with
(ICMP traffic, UDP, TCP) and no buffer problems.
Mpd was generating these pro
10 matches
Mail list logo
