I'm looking into this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/31586
In short, using ng_bridge(4) with de(4) and xl(4) drivers,
they're seeing broken TCP checksums on the wire. It sounds
like there's some delayed TCP checksum hack that is breaking
when doing bridging this way.
C
Hi ...
I have two issues ... both related to the ndp(IPV6)utility :
1. I am trying to add a temporary entry into the neighbor discovery cache
using ndp. I noticed that it has a temp flag inorder to add temporary
entries(documented in the man page as well).
Here is wot i did :
ndp -s 3ffe::1123
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm moving from the wx driver to either the gx or em driver. I haven't seen
> a lot of traffic about either and I was wondering what people's experiences
> have been like. Has any one done performance tests? How do the three drivers
> stack up? Any negative points on either driver?
Hi guys,
I'm moving from the wx driver to either the gx or em driver. I haven't seen
a lot of traffic about either and I was wondering what people's experiences
have been like. Has any one done performance tests? How do the three drivers
stack up? Any negative points on either driver?
Also, are
> "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It's fixed. mergemaster swapped these two lines in /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.ne.mediaone.net
::1 localhost localhost.ne.mediaone.net
to
::1 localhost localhost.
> "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Julian> u by definition a tcp session cannot be to 255.255.255.255
Julian> what on EARTH is it trying to do?
I haven't the slightest idea... I'm running AltaVist Tunnel 97. A five
year old binary with no source. I guess I should
u by definition a tcp session cannot be to 255.255.255.255
what on EARTH is it trying to do?
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, David A. Panariti wrote:
> > "Garrett" == Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Garrett> < Garrett> A. Panariti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> Unfortunately, all
> "Garrett" == Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garrett> < A. Panariti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Unfortunately, all I have is a binary for the app, so I can't
>> figure out what they are doing. I don't even know if making a TCP
>> connection to 255.255.255.255 is legal.
Garre
< said:
> Unfortunately, all I have is a binary for the app, so I can't figure
> out what they are doing. I don't even know if making a TCP connection
> to 255.255.255.255 is legal.
It is utterly, 100% bogus.
> Does anyone know where this explicit broadcast route is being added,
> and why? Is
hmm interesting...
any docs?
(we always include a man page when we commit a new node type.)
Any comments on netgraph in general
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Marko Zec wrote:
> The result of an innocent netgraph programming exercise can be found at:
>
> http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/ng_dummy/
>
> "ng
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Alexey Luckyanchikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have such network topology:
>
> ++++++
> | Server |< MTU 1500 >| Router |< MTU 1476 >| Client |
> +++--
Hello all,
4.5R has a new behavior that is breaking an old (and essential)
application of mine.
When the app tries to make a TCP connection to 255.255.255.255,
(as shown by strace:
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
fcntl(3,
Brian Somers writes:
| I don't know a great deal about PPTP, but as it happens, I recently
| looked for a radius server that'd talk MSCHAPv2 - so that I could teach
| ppp to do it.
|
| I couldn't find any support in the ports, and then our [potential]
| client backed out, so I never got any fu
> I am working on implementation of AX.25 protocol. My code also needs ARP
> and I was wondering if there is a way to use existing ARP code, or do I
> need to duplicate code and use my arp structure instead original one? I
> need arp to resolve HAM addresses to IP addresses. HAM address has
Hello,
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002, Michael Sierchio wrote:
MS> Alexey Luckyanchikov wrote:
MS>
MS>
MS> >14:06:48.477578 server.7 > client.1371: . 1437:2897(1460) ack 10001 win
MS> >65535 (DF) (ttl 64, id 25428, len 1500)
MS> >^^^
MS> >Server send packet with size
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
LAM> Is the server filtering out ICMP traffic with ipfw or something?
Server have not any filters. ipfw support is compiled in, but first rule
is 'allow ip from any to any' and dump which you can see below was made
on server.
LAM> > Alexey Luckyanchi
Is the server filtering out ICMP traffic with ipfw or something?
> Alexey Luckyanchikov wrote:
>
>
> > 14:06:48.477578 server.7 > client.1371: . 1437:2897(1460) ack 10001 win 65535 (DF)
>(ttl 64, id 25428, len 1500)
> > ^^^
> > Server send packet with size
Alexey Luckyanchikov wrote:
> 14:06:48.477578 server.7 > client.1371: . 1437:2897(1460) ack 10001 win 65535 (DF)
>(ttl 64, id 25428, len 1500)
> ^^^
> Server send packet with size 1500 bytes
>
> 14:06:48.682558 router > server: icmp: client unreachable - nee
The result of an innocent netgraph programming exercise can be found at:
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/ng_dummy/
"ng_dummy" is a simple traffic shaper node that implements control of
traffic flow in both upstream and downstream direction. In each
direction, the traffic flows through the sequence
Hello,
I have such network topology:
++++++
| Server |< MTU 1500 >| Router |< MTU 1476 >| Client |
++++++
Server is box with FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE, it ha
I recently was heard to elocute:
>Memory wise, the patches only increase memory use in the dynamic rules (a
>single unsigned short), using a union to store the information in the main
>ruleset since for keep-state rules the union in question was not in use (or
>so I believe - no one has told me
21 matches
Mail list logo
