Re: FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd > for redirects to internal network resources. (Hi Marshall, therefore > Cc: to you, since its yours and I have a question). > > http://www.rootprompt.net/freebsd

Filtering packets received through an ipsec tunnel

Hello, > This message was already posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but with > limited success. I'm hoping that someone on [EMAIL PROTECTED] can give me > some more information. By experimenting with ipsec and looking at the source of "ip_input.c" a co-worker and I found the following out. When a

Re: Performance of in_cksum.c

If you are referring to the sys/netinet/in_cksum.c file, it is a portable version. For specific architectures look at the following directories. 386 family version: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable/src/sys/i386/i386/in_cksum. c Alpha version: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeB

FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd for redirects to internal network resources. (Hi Marshall, therefore Cc: to you, since its yours and I have a question). http://www.rootprompt.net/freebsd_firewall.html Based on these informations I think I could get rid of