Lars Eggert writes:
> > I'm trying to do pptp with mpd-netgraph and a stable kernel build from a
> > day ago. Everytime I run it on my IBM T-20 laptop (with fxp interface),
> > it negotiates the link and as it's ready to be used the laptop crashes:
>
> I've seen mpd crashes with Cisco VPN servers
a couple of comments..
understand mbufs vs Linux pkbufs.
there are several "added" protocols.
see what netgraph does to add itself as a protocol
the socket part of doing so is in ng_socket.c
and the bottom end is in ng_base.c where it adds a handler to the
netisr structures. look however at ho
On Wednesday 12 December 2001 23:35, Sam Tannous wrote:
> I've download the ethfw patches (v1.2) and they work fine
> on my 4.4 system. One other good reason to add ethfw
> to the existing ipfw code (and this is purely subjective)
> is that it would look more like ipfw:
>
> 00100 27 1144 allow
RIFRAF Routing
RIFRAF (Remote Identification Field Random Action Filter) Routing is part of a phased
approach to evolving from 32-bit IPv4 Internet
Addressing to larger address spaces. The RIFRAF feature in an IP stack, allows for
remote access control of the left-most 8-bits of
the normally 16
> Ah, well that is good news. I'm not familiar with e-smith, but from the
>looks of their site it supports installing binary apache modules via RPM. They
>have a pretty good list of contributed RPMs on their site (under "modules" on
>the right of e-smith.org), but unfortunately it does not incl
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Tom wrote:
> Well, running Apache I'm sure it can be done - but this depends on the
> methods which have to be taken to have it up and running. I have posted a
> message on the e-smith forum about adding mods to an already installed
> Apache server - but they are pretty s
Hi Johan
At 08:13 12/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>I perhaps should have read all of the mail.
>
>Well - Squid got X-Forwarded for,
>And that't easy to configure Apache to look into, I believe that the
>newer IIS server if that's used also are quite good at that type of
>access.
>
>If I remember
At 19:04 11/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Tom Peck wrote:
>
> > YES! That's exactly the problem! Your memory is obviously far superior to
> > most :-).
> >
>
> That's a scary proposition indeed! :)
>
> > > Of course, if you have the source to your web server (i.e. apache)
>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:15:58PM -0500, Sam Tannous wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 01:42:07PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Shaun Marko wrote:
> > > Could you also get the desired result by using a kernel without
> > > VLAN support?
> > > The origina
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 01:42:07PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Shaun Marko wrote:
> > Could you also get the desired result by using a kernel without
> > VLAN support?
> > The original poster said he didn't want to configure VLAN interfaces
> > anyway.
I perhaps should have read all of the mail.
Well - Squid got X-Forwarded for,
And that't easy to configure Apache to look into, I believe that the
newer IIS server if that's used also are quite good at that type of
access.
If I remember correctly doing a reverse proxy under Apache would
(
On 2001-12-11, Romain Berrendonner wrote:
> Le 2001-12-11 19:07 UTC+0100, Romain Berrendonner a ecrit:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does anybody know a SCTP (RFC ) implementation in FreeBSD ?
> >
> Off course, I meant 8)
>
> RFC 2960 Stream Control Transmission Protocol. R. Stewart, Q. Xie, K.
>
Hi, I
need your help. I can redirect port 3389 for MS terminal server. I have
FreeBsd 3.4. I read manual for natd and for NAT. I
do natd -redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.20:3389 3389 -interface
ep0 There is no error. But I cannot conection on 192.168.1.20
from outside. Can You Help me?
Than
13 matches
Mail list logo
