On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:59:39PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> Garrett and I discussed what IFF_NOARP should mean about 4-5 years
> ago; we decided that it probably menat "no ARP". We discussed
> the idea of seperating it out into two flags; "Don't reply to ARP"
> and "don't pay attention to A
Hi All,
How does the NAT in the ip_nat.c take
care of FTP port and PASV commands?
Regards
kshitij
For the fun of it, I turned on log_in_vain. And I'm seeing *lots* of
stuff one might expect (port scans, Nimda poking at my mail server,
SMTP to the web server, etc). But I'm also seeing stuff I don't expect,
primarily in the areas of DNS and localhost traffic. For example:
Dec 6 08:15:39 sc
I'm trying to get this Netgear 662T Gigabit card to work in my file server.
As soon as the interface is flagged "UP" with "ifconfig nge0 up" or
"ifconfig nge0 inet x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x", the carrier is lost and the
media type (set to auto) changes from "1000baseTX " to
"". Manually forcing the
yes,
you are right
regards,
misho
- Original Message -
From: "Luigi Rizzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "misho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:00 AM
Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: net polling code now in STABLE.
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 04:50:46AM
Garrett and I discussed what IFF_NOARP should mean about 4-5 years
ago; we decided that it probably menat "no ARP". We discussed
the idea of seperating it out into two flags; "Don't reply to ARP"
and "don't pay attention to ARP" but decided to wait and see what
people thought. 4-5 years is prob
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:29:27PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:22:05PM +0500, Dingo wrote:
> > ipfilters ipnat We ran into the IPSec intercept problem with 4.3,
> > can you tell me when the changes were MFCd ? it might just be a matter
> > of updateing Ipfilter on
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:40:18AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> It would seem that it only takes one manufacturer to break this
> cycle. There was also more incentive to do this when access points
> were $1000 instead of $149.
Yes, but for all practical purposes there are only two manufactures
As I recall, delays like that come from the power-saving mode on
the card. Turn power-saving off to make them go away.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:23:52AM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Marco Molteni writes:
> | I am writing a small program that does a pcap_open_live() on the
> | Aironet an device
Marco Molteni writes:
| I am writing a small program that does a pcap_open_live() on the
| Aironet an device, PCMCIA mode. System is a recent -stable on a
| Toshiba Portege 7200 laptop.
|
| Now, pcap_open_live() takes more than 1 sec to return. Is this long
| time expected?
Hmm, don't seem to rec
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:22:05PM +0500, Dingo wrote:
> ipfilters ipnat We ran into the IPSec intercept problem with 4.3,
> can you tell me when the changes were MFCd ? it might just be a matter
> of updateing Ipfilter on this specific server. its a 4.3 RELEASE box.
> But If I am correct, you
Hi
I have seen Mr.Ping Pan's implementation of this. This seems to be just
for receiving a packet with some IP option through a raw IP socket. This
doesn't seem to be containing the kernel processing part of a packet
with router alert option. In netinet6 I have seen that the ip6_input()
function
Hi,
I am writing a small program that does a pcap_open_live() on the
Aironet an device, PCMCIA mode. System is a recent -stable on a
Toshiba Portege 7200 laptop.
Now, pcap_open_live() takes more than 1 sec to return. Is this long
time expected?
thanks
marco
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Ping Pan has implemented a complete IP options package for FreeBSD versions
up to 4.0. Maybe it's easy to port it to newer versions. See
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~pingpan/software_list.htm
Martin
> Could anyone tell me if Router Alert option processing is implemented in
> FreeBSD 4.1 ip(v4) st
Hi
Could anyone tell me if Router Alert option processing is implemented in
FreeBSD 4.1 ip(v4) stack? Are there any patches available for this? I
could find only the option addition part while browsing through the
sources. I couldn't find the receiving part of this.
Thanks in advance.
regards
15 matches
Mail list logo
