On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 07:37:31AM -, Lawrence Farr wrote:
> Have you any tests I could run to verify it's stability?
no, other than flood the interfaces with traffic and see the
difference when turning kern.polling.enable on and off...
cheers
luigi
> Lawrence Farr
> EPC Dir
Have you any tests I could run to verify it's stability?
Lawrence Farr
EPC Direct Limited
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Luigi Rizzo
> Sent: 04 December 2001 06:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: HEADS-UP: net polling code no
Hi,
We're seeing strange behavior of mpd (netgraph-ified ppp daemon)
under -current that doesn't occur under -stable.
The problem is that when mpd tries to do a connect(2) on a
(PF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_GRE), the kernel returns EINPROGRESS
instead of succeeding immediately (note: this is a dat
[Bcc to -stable because of relevance there]
With the approval of the release engineer, a revised version of
the network polling code is now in STABLE. It would be great if
you could try it out and send feedback, so we con sort out issues
(if any) before the release of 4.5.
Do not be afraid to u
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Chutima S. wrote:
> Dear all
>
> As now I have two Internet link and FreeBSD-3.4 as a Firewall for our
> servers. (Please see below with sample IP addresses)
>
>
> ISP1 dialup account to ISP2
> | |
>
Dear all
As now I have two Internet link and FreeBSD-3.4 as a Firewall for our
servers. (Please see below with sample IP addresses)
ISP1 dialup account to ISP2
| |
-
| Router |
On Monday 03 December 2001 21:28, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Sebastien,
> this is a personal point of view, and I know that people think
> differently, but I believe it would be a lot more interesting if
> you would design ethfw as an add-on for ipfw as opposed to a separate
> thing. Not only it would r
Sebastien,
this is a personal point of view, and I know that people think
differently, but I believe it would be a lot more interesting if
you would design ethfw as an add-on for ipfw as opposed to a separate
thing. Not only it would remove some replication from the code (all
[sg]etsockopt, basica
Hi,
I just release a new patch file for implementing an Ethernet Firewall under
FreeBSD. the tar.gz distro come with a patch for 4.4 kernels, an utility
ethfw to control rules and a man page. Is there a possibility to implement
this patch (based on Luigi Rizzo ipfw code) on the FreeBSD /usr/sr
