Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-18 Thread Sam Leffler (at Usenix)
Guiess we missed you with our spam :-) http://www.usenix.org/events/bsdcon02/ - Original Message - From: "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Garrett Wollman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-18 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
> err, where is BSDcon this year? Here ya go: Hotel Information Cathedral Hill Hotel 1101 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California 94109 Toll Free: 1 800 622 0855 Local Telephone: 1 415 776 8200 Reservation Fax: 1 415 441 2841 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Later, George To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-18 Thread Julian Elischer
err, where is BSDcon this year? On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > I won't be at LISA but would be interested in hearing what y'all come up with. > > BSDCon is in my home town so it's a doddle to make it there for me. > > Later, > George > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-18 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
I won't be at LISA but would be interested in hearing what y'all come up with. BSDCon is in my home town so it's a doddle to make it there for me. Later, George To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-18 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julian Elischer writes: > > i actually suggested one i.e. have explicit pointers > > to metadata area(s) in the pkthdr. I think you forget the > > most fundamental feature which is performance. > > This is way more important than flexibility i think. > > Which is the reason that this problem exis

Re: t_dupacks to u_int?

2001-11-18 Thread Archie Cobbs
Jonathan Lemon writes: > On the surface, I don't see a problem with it, but I wonder why you > believe it is needed. Changing the value of rexmttresh is probably > not a good idea, and I would definitely prefer not to expose it as a > user tunable knob. > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 06:51:02PM -06