[ -net removed, -questions added ]
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:08:08PM -0700, Anuranjan wrote:
> I need to install the WLAN card (either a Cisco Aironet 350, or a Lucent
> WaveLAN) and I think the drivers are "an" and "wi" resp. How can I install
> these cards and the respective drivers? My kernel
>Yoshi,
>I have attached a patch. Let me know if this fixes the problem.
>
>jayanth
>
Jayanth,
thanks for the patch. I tested with it, and the system performs nicely.
I appreciate your help.
Yoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of th
I need to install the WLAN card (either a Cisco Aironet 350, or a Lucent
WaveLAN) and I think the drivers are "an" and "wi" resp. How can I install
these cards and the respective drivers? My kernel seems to be configured for
it as I can see entries for both uncommented in my /usr/src/i386/conf/NEW
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Jasper O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I think that if you send out a packet on one of these interfaces it may
> > still make it out because we don't actually (last time I checked) bother
> > to disconnect that, but all incoming packets wi
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Jasper O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I think that if you send out a packet on one of these interfaces it may
> > still make it out because we don't actually (last time I checked) bother
> > to disconnect that, but all incoming packets wi
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I think that if you send out a packet on one of these interfaces it may
> still make it out because we don't actually (last time I checked) bother
> to disconnect that, but all incoming packets will be passed to the bridge
> module, which will be keeop
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > +/*
> > + * NB: For FreeBSD, it is assumed that each NIC driver's softc starts with
> > + * one of these structures, typically held within an arpcom structure.
> > + */
>
> This has been true since at least 4.2.
from my memory, I'ts
Yes- this may have been true for a long time - but quite a number of Unix
variants don't require it, so I forgot :-).. For example, neither OpenBSD nor
NetBSD seem to require it.
It turns out that this is only stumbled on rarely- but if it's all the same to
you, a comment would help a lot.
-mat
Huh. Too bad you didn't point me at the bug- it would have saved me a
morning's debugging.
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Jim McGrath wrote:
> I ran into this same problem with the wx driver and submitted a pr.
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29249
>
> Jim
>
>
> -Original Message-
< This has been true since at least 4.2.
Oops -- this is going to be the source of a lot of confusion. By 4.2
I am referring to 4.2BSD, of course, and not FreeBSD 4.2 which would
not be much of a precedent.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ne
All the interfaces specified will stop working as normal interfaces, as
their lower halves will be disconnected from their upper halves.. in other
words the lower 'physical' part is run without any connection to the
normal networking layer.. The bridging code (netgraph bridging) takes
over this f
Not only that but the ifnet structure must be the first part of the arpcom
struct so that arpcm, ifnet and softc often need to be the same.. I've
been gradually trying to remove this requirement over the last 10 years
but it's still there.. :-/
Comments can't hurt though..
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, M
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Jasper O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > If you want any of these packets to also be passed to the local machine
> > you should select one of the local interfaces (any will do) and add it in
> > the LOCAL_INTERFACE entry. This entry specifie
I ran into this same problem with the wx driver and submitted a pr.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29249
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: review of minor clarifying com
< said:
> +/*
> + * NB: For FreeBSD, it is assumed that each NIC driver's softc starts with
> + * one of these structures, typically held within an arpcom structure.
> + */
This has been true since at least 4.2.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freeb
This bit me in the butt yet again about FreeBSD and some assumptions about how
a NIC's softc is laid out- I don't really it stated elsewhere, so a couple
source file comments seem in order.. Frankly, this kind of assumption is
dangerous and unnecessary with methods, but at the very least it ought
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> If you want any of these packets to also be passed to the local machine
> you should select one of the local interfaces (any will do) and add it in
> the LOCAL_INTERFACE entry. This entry specifies to the bridging code that
> the upper (i.e. KERNEL sid
The bridging code connects to the lower (i.e. WIRE) part of each interface
mentionned an dintercepts all packets coming in.
If you want any of these packets to also be passed to the local machine
you should select one of the local interfaces (any will do) and add it in
the LOCAL_INTERFACE entry
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:43:18PM -0400, Steve Shorter wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> I just went to setup some ifpw on server and it broke dns
> lookups, which are on 192.168.60.5. So based on the ipfw logs I was
> prompted to do a netstat -rn and this is what it shows
>
> 192.168.60.5 is on
Howdy!
I just went to setup some ifpw on server and it broke dns
lookups, which are on 192.168.60.5. So based on the ipfw logs I was
prompted to do a netstat -rn and this is what it shows
192.168.60.5 is on lo0??. 0:e0:81:1:bd:70 is the MAC for
fxp1, but what is it doing showing
I posted this message to -questions last week, but never got a response,
so perhaps someone on this list (-net) can help out.
I'm trying to learn more about the netgraph bridging module, and I ran
across this comment in /usr/share/examples/netgraph/ether.bridge:
[quote]
# List the names of the
Hi all,
I am going through the function
int
rn_walktree (register struct radix_node *rn,
rn_walk_function f, ...)
defined in radix.c file. I have doubt about following
while loop in that function.
/* If at right child go back up, otherwise, go right
*/
while (rn->rn_p->rn_r == rn && (rn->rn_
22 matches
Mail list logo
