Hi all,
Thanks so much for your response and help!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> The spls have no effect any longer, we're leaving them in however
> to mark places where protection is needed, when a subsystem becomes
> MP safe the spls are removed. As far as glabals there are actually
> very few there.
OK, I'll start supping -CURRENT again.
> Interesting!
Or perhaps a fo
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010929 10:05] wrote:
> > Hopefully, there's nothing inherently bad with it that will make it
> > too difficult.
>
> Well, no more difficult than the current network stack. The number
> of global variables (at least when I was looking at the old 4.4 B
> The most signifigant changes that I can think of are:
> SMP primatives
> KSE
> FFS Snapshots
> Cardbus
>
Other than KSE (which I've only seen lately and so I don't
know what it is) SMP should be the only thing that deeply
affects the stack, at least to my currently limited knowledge.
> Hopefu
Nguyen-Tuong Long Le wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering what is the side effects of increasing FD_SETSIZE
> beyond 1024? Our group have a propiertary web server software that
> handles a large number of sockets. While increasing the kern.maxfiles
> and kern.maxfilesperproc gives our web server mo
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:59:32 -0400,
> "Alex Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Currently the DNS system requires IPv4 transport. If you disable IPv4
>> completely, you cannot resolve any hostnames. In this case, you must
>> set up DNS proxy (ex. totd) from IPv6 to IPv4. Is this y
