Re: Ipv6

2001-09-27 Thread Keiichi SHIMA / 島慶一
Alex Feldman wrote: > > I update the driver to accept IPv6 address. > When I configure interface for both IPv4 and IPv6, everything is good (I > can > ping), but when I'm using only IPv6, the remote machine not replying to my > request. > > Is it some configuration problem? Or something els

RE: FreeBSD and Cisco router IPSEC tunnel

2001-09-27 Thread ipver four
>What router are you talking about? The ex-Altiga routers, or Cisco's own I am thinking about Cisco 7200 or 3600 series. Thanks, John _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp To Unsubscribe: s

Re: simple udp question

2001-09-27 Thread Archie Cobbs
jayanth writes: > one of the developers here noticed that if a process does > the following three steps: > > binds a udp socket to a specific IP address > connects the udp socket > calls connect with a NULL parameter, to disconnect the socket. > > The socket now loses its originally bound IP add

simple udp question

2001-09-27 Thread jayanth
one of the developers here noticed that if a process does the following three steps: binds a udp socket to a specific IP address connects the udp socket calls connect with a NULL parameter, to disconnect the socket. The socket now loses its originally bound IP address because udp_disconnect forc

Re: Network optimization?

2001-09-27 Thread Joseph Gleason
To isolate drives from network, I usually use dd, faucet and hose to test the network. cd /usr/ports/net/netpipes make install clean on System A: faucet 45363 --in dd if=/dev/stdin of=/dev/null bs=1k on System B: hose HostA 45363 --out dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/stdout bs=1k count=1m Of course,

RE: FreeBSD and Cisco router IPSEC tunnel

2001-09-27 Thread Peter Blok
What router are you talking about? The ex-Altiga routers, or Cisco's own -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ipver four Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 04:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD and Cisco router IPSEC tunnel Has anyone

Re: Alteon gigE NIC (if_ti driver) problems

2001-09-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 11:48:56 -0500, Matthew Rezny wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, it set me in the right direction. I checked > my fibre before but went ahead and checked it again. In doing so, I > rearranged the cables at the switch to check if that made a difference. > Sure enough, one p

Re: TCP performance question

2001-09-27 Thread jayanth
Probably add a new flag TF_IDLE that is true, if there is more data to send when the connection was idle. This way the next time around the idle variable will be true if the TF_IDLE flag is true and if we can empty the socket buffer all the data will be sent. Will send you a patch soon. jayanth

Re: Alteon gigE NIC (if_ti driver) problems

2001-09-27 Thread Matthew Rezny
Thanks for the suggestion, it set me in the right direction. I checked my fibre before but went ahead and checked it again. In doing so, I rearranged the cables at the switch to check if that made a difference. Sure enough, one port on the switch makes the connection drop often. I hope its just du

VPN over VLANS and dynamic clients

2001-09-27 Thread Elliott Perrin
Hello there, I am not currently subscribed to net or security so if I could be CC'ed on all replies that would be excellent. I am trying to setup VPN connectivity for a client that needs to be able to log in to their office from dynamic IP's. I have setup VLANS over an fxp card that corespond to

Re: 3COM 3c985-SX or 3c985B-SX

2001-09-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 16:36:06 -0400, Sam Tannous wrote: > >From what I've seen in this list, this seems > to be the best performing gigabit ethernet card > on FreeBSD. Most stores now stock the newer > 3c985B-SX rather then the 3c985-SX. Does the existing > driver handle the newer "b" card as

Re: Alteon gigE NIC (if_ti driver) problems

2001-09-27 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 15:55:30 -0500, Matthew Rezny wrote: > I have some more information since my initial posting yesterday. I set > the NMBCLUSTERS back to default, which made no difference. Therefore, > moving from 4.3 to 4.4 is what drastically increased the frequency at > which the link goe

RE: Patch to allow disabling logging of arp movements through sysctl

2001-09-27 Thread Stephen Hurd
> is there any chance this patch will be commited soon to the -STABLE > tree? i'm > having a similar problems and it's driving me crazy. my log is full > with all > the arp movement messages. As I understand it, there's a very good change... possibly so good that it's already done. ;-) Alfred P

Re: Patch to allow disabling logging of arp movements through sysctl

2001-09-27 Thread nuzrin yaapar
is there any chance this patch will be commited soon to the -STABLE tree? i'm having a similar problems and it's driving me crazy. my log is full with all the arp movement messages. On Tuesday 04 September 2001 5:42 am, Josef Karthauser wrote: > You should really send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]