I'd like to commit something like the following patch to create clonable
interfaces at boot so they can be configured the normal way. Any one
have comments or suggestions?
-- Brooks
Index: etc/rc.network
===
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:07:22AM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >Howdy!
> >
> > I recently installed 4.4RC.
> >
> > In this release rfc1323 extensions are turned on by default
> >which is a change from 4.3. However, tuning(7) says that rfc1323
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Howdy!
>
> I recently installed 4.4RC.
>
> In this release rfc1323 extensions are turned on by default
>which is a change from 4.3. However, tuning(7) says that rfc1323
>extensions should be off unless "you absolutely have to"
>turn them on.
mark tinguely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> in tcp_usr_connect() and tcp6_usr_connect() in sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
> in both FreeBSD 4.3 and -current is there a missing
> tp = intotcpcb(inp);
> call? It seems from my eyes that "tp" is not initialized.
It's initialized in COMMON_START().
in tcp_usr_connect() and tcp6_usr_connect() in sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
in both FreeBSD 4.3 and -current is there a missing
tp = intotcpcb(inp);
call? It seems from my eyes that "tp" is not initialized.
--mark tinguely.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
Howdy!
I recently installed 4.4RC.
In this release rfc1323 extensions are turned on by default
which is a change from 4.3. However, tuning(7) says that rfc1323
extensions should be off unless "you absolutely have to"
turn them on.
I was wondering if the change in defau