On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > However, before that is done, I think some changes should be made; all the
> > #ifdef SACK and #ifdef FACKs are ugly. They should be taken out, and
> > runtime tuneables (defaulting to on) should be added around the pieces
Hello All!
I would like to answer your queries as follows:
SACK Model
--
I looked at PSC web site for SACK/FACK patch for FreeBSD, the latest patch I
could found was for Release2.2.5 (by Luigi Rizzo). After that I surfed web for
any latest information for SACK patch. I even wr
Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Dave Zarzycki wrote:
>
> > Attached and tested.
> >
> > I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects.
> >
> > davez
> >
> > --
> > Dave Zarzycki
>
> I haven't done any testing of this code, but having SACK support would
> certainly be nice, so
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Dave Zarzycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 19:23] wrote:
> > Attached and tested.
> >
> > I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects.
>
> I don't object, I'm just wondering if you know could discuss
> the implementation here versus the other o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I've been having similar problems with my 4.4-RC Vaio F807K whenever I
: do a lot of NFS over my wi0 (Buffalo wireless card), every so often my
: laptop just completely freezes.
I think that might be due to a bug in the shared interrupt c
* Dave Zarzycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 19:23] wrote:
> Attached and tested.
>
> I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects.
I don't object, I'm just wondering if you know could discuss
the implementation here versus the other ones avaiable at:
http://www.psc.edu/networking/all_sack.h
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> However, before that is done, I think some changes should be made; all the
> #ifdef SACK and #ifdef FACKs are ugly. They should be taken out, and
> runtime tuneables (defaulting to on) should be added around the pieces of
> code that actually control
certyainly looks safe because of the ifdefs..
we can rip them out later but for now it provides some good safety.
Might put the new routines in tcp_sack.c
(that may be contraversial)
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Dave Zarzycki wrote:
> Attached and tested.
>
> I'd like to merge this in unless anybody o
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Dave Zarzycki wrote:
> Attached and tested.
>
> I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects.
>
> davez
>
> --
> Dave Zarzycki
I haven't done any testing of this code, but having SACK support would
certainly be nice, so I think committing it to -current with the intenti
The latest domain name extension has arrived .SEX!!! It's the fresh ,new,
exciting web address that is taking the world by storm.
Who wants to be .com when you can now be .SEX
Register your .SEX domain name today exclusively at:
http://www.dotsex.com
yes, because some people are porting it..
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I would like to commit ARP support for link level addresses with
> > arbitrary length. Patches against HEAD attached. Most of this stuff
> > was taken from NetBSD.
>
> Why? Is there any reas
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I would like to commit ARP support for link level addresses with
> > arbitrary length. Patches against HEAD attached. Most of this stuff
> > was taken from NetBSD.
>
> Why? Is there any reason to believe
< said:
> Someone is currently working on just that.
To what end?
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
* Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 12:02] wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I would like to commit ARP support for link level addresses with
> > arbitrary length. Patches against HEAD attached. Most of this stuff
> > was taken from NetBSD.
>
> Why? Is there any reason to believe that FreeBSD wi
< said:
> I would like to commit ARP support for link level addresses with
> arbitrary length. Patches against HEAD attached. Most of this stuff
> was taken from NetBSD.
Why? Is there any reason to believe that FreeBSD will (or even should)
ever support ARCNET?
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: sen
Warner Losh writes:
> After talking with Ian Dowse, I think that we've hammered out what may
> cause this. Basically, the problem is
I'm afraid your patch didn't fix the problem on my laptop. It
certainly changed the behaviour and the system doesn't crash any more,
but I'm almost unable to
I have the following code:
pid_t pid;
int sv[2];
int val;
char arg0[] = "someotherprog";
char arg1[] = VSTRING;
char* arg[] = {arg0, arg1, 0};
socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sv);
printf("socketpair returned %i,%i\n", sv[0], sv[
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:48:26AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 06:36:46PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:19:22AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > >
> > > I forget why I picked ENETRESET; probably because it was the
> > > first thing that lea
hi, there!
I would like to commit ARP support for link level addresses with
arbitrary length. Patches against HEAD attached. Most of this stuff
was taken from NetBSD.
/fjoe
--- net/if.c.orig Wed Jul 18 23:47:39 2001
+++ net/if.cTue Jul 17 16:36:04 2001
@@ -229,6 +229,7 @@
19 matches
Mail list logo
