--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll have to include more information about what
> you're trying to
> do.
>
> Kris
>
Thanks Kris. I'll try to be more specific:
Currently, I'm porting a /sys/sys/malloc.h from BSD
to FreeBSD. It turns out that the file I'm working on
ha
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:29:13AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> This works nicely on my -stale box. Thanks.
>
> One niggle though :) It's probably worth changing
> ``$FreeBSD: $'' to ``$FreeBSD$'' in your patched version.
> Without this, mergemaster assumes that the new version in /u
> I plan to MFC the network interface cloning support and the gif
> modularization early next week unless someone has objections. I'd like
> to get it in before the code slush and since I'll be leaving for a week
> on the 31st, that means sometime early to mid next week to allow for any
> bug rep
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:37:25PM -0700, Marcelo Carvalho wrote:
> In BSD, the /sys/malloc.h file has a list of
> definitions of "types of memory to be allocated" that
> doesn't appear in the corresponding file in Freebsd.
>
> Does anybody know where can I find the corresponding
> information i
Hi,
In BSD, the /sys/malloc.h file has a list of
definitions of "types of memory to be allocated" that
doesn't appear in the corresponding file in Freebsd.
Does anybody know where can I find the corresponding
information in FreeBSD? Are they defined as well?
Thanks.
__
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:37:50PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > A diff is available at:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~brooks/patches/gif-stable.diff
>
> You forgot:
>
> Index: LINT
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/c
> I plan to MFC the network interface cloning support and the gif
> modularization early next week unless someone has objections. I'd like
> to get it in before the code slush and since I'll be leaving for a week
> on the 31st, that means sometime early to mid next week to allow for any
> bug rep
I plan to MFC the network interface cloning support and the gif
modularization early next week unless someone has objections. I'd like
to get it in before the code slush and since I'll be leaving for a week
on the 31st, that means sometime early to mid next week to allow for any
bug reports. I d
Do you mean why did the original BSD people choose the methos used in
the mbuf code in 1982 (or whenever)?
1/ copying data is a waste of time
2/ incoming packets are of unpredictable size
but tend to be either full-size or small with few in between.
3/ memory was expensive and slow
On Fri, 20
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:21:05 +0200 (MEST)
> Anastasia Leventi-Peetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
leventi> I have tried to start address autoconfiguration on my FreeBSD-4.0 system
leventi> by putting
leventi> ip6mode="autohost"
leventi> rtsol="YES" rtsol_flags="sm1" # set your interface he
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 08:18:00PM +0200, Christophe Prévotaux wrote:
> I am looking for a G703 capable PCI interface card supported by FreeBSD
> does such a thing exists ?
Depends on what kind of link you want to put this on.
I'm looking for the same thing (for a E3 link) and I have found
the
>I have tried to start address autoconfiguration on my FreeBSD-4.0 system
>by putting
>ip6mode="autohost"
>rtsol="YES" rtsol_flags="xl0" # set your interface here
>in rc.conf and rebooting the system.
>After reboot I still had only Link-Local-Address only, though a router makes
>advertisement i
I have tried to start address autoconfiguration on my FreeBSD-4.0 system
by putting
ip6mode="autohost"
rtsol="YES" rtsol_flags="sm1" # set your interface here
in rc.conf and rebooting the system.
After reboot I still had only Link-Local-Address only, though a router makes
advertisement in Net.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
Martin Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MPLS has been implemented for FreeBSD in the Nistswitch project
> http://www.antd.nist.gov/itg/nistswitch/
> but I don't know the current project status.
>
> I've added rudimentary MPLS signalling support to RS
MPLS has been implemented for FreeBSD in the Nistswitch project
http://www.antd.nist.gov/itg/nistswitch/
but I don't know the current project status.
I've added rudimentary MPLS signalling support to RSVP (label distribution
and explicit routing according to draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-07.txt
Hi,
My question is why did you choose mbuf?
is it because you are writing the code in unix systems?
Is it because mbufs allow us to avoid coping as much as possible?
I feel that a linear buffer might have saved some of the mbuf
modifications.
regards
ravi prasad
___
Hi,
The following lines are from the Kame implementation notes
"Each interface joins the solicited multicast address and the
link-local all-nodes multicast addresses (e.g. fe80::1:ff01:6317
and ff02::1, respectively, on the link the interface is attached).
In addition to a link-local address,
17 matches
Mail list logo
